Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:35:00.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

P-mode leakage and Lyman-α intensity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

W. Finsterle ,
M. Haberreiter ,
S. Kosovichev  and
W. Schmutz
W. Finsterle
Affiliation:
PMOD/WRC, Dorfstr. 33, CH-7260 Davos Dorf, Switzerland
M. Haberreiter
Affiliation:
PMOD/WRC, Dorfstr. 33, CH-7260 Davos Dorf, Switzerland
S. Kosovichev
Affiliation:
HEPL, Standford University, Stanford CA, U.S.A. email: [email protected]
W. Schmutz
Affiliation:
PMOD/WRC, Dorfstr. 33, CH-7260 Davos Dorf, Switzerland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present an observational test of the hypothesis that leaking p modes heat the solar chromosphere. The amplitude of the leaking p modes in magneto-acoustic portals is determined using MOTH and MDI data. We simulate the propagation of these modes into the chromosphere to determine the height where the wave energy is dissipated by shock waves. A statistical approach is then used to check if this heating process could account for the observed variability of the intensity in the Lyman-α emission.

Keywords

wavesSun: atmosphereSun: photosphereSun: chromosphereSun: oscillationsSun: magnetic fieldsSun: UV radiation
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S247: Waves & Oscillations in the Solar Atmosphere: Heating and Magneto-Seismology , September 2007 , pp. 74 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Ayres, T.R., Testerman, L., & Brault, J.W. 1986, ApJ, 304, 542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, L. M. B. C. 1987, Rev. Modern Phys., 59, 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pontieu, B., Tarbell, T., & Erdélyi, R. 2003, ApJ, 590, 502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pontieu, B., Erdélyi, R., & de Wijn, A. G. 2003, ApJ, 595, L63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pontieu, B., & Erdélyi, R. 2006, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 364, 383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finsterle, W., Jefferies, S. M., Cacciani, A., Rapex, P., Giebink, C., Knox, A., & DiMartino, V. 2004, Solar Phys., 220, 317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberreiter, M., & Finsterle, W. (2007), Solar Phys., submittedGoogle Scholar
Handy, B.N., & the TRACE team 1999, Solar Phys., 187, 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferies, S.M., McIntosh, S.W., Armstrong, J.D., Bogdan, T.J., Cacciani, A., & Fleck, B. 2006, ApJ, 648, L151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosovichev, A. G., & Popov, Y. P. 1981, BULLETIN. CRIMEAN ASTROPHYSICAL OBS, 63, 15Google Scholar
Marsh, M. S., & Walsh, R. W., 2006, ApJ, 643, 540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherrer, P., & the MDI team 1995, Solar Phys., 162, 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernazza, J., Avrett, E., Loeser, R. 1981, ApJS, 45, 635CrossRefGoogle Scholar