Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:33:47.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The planetary nebula luminosity function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

Robin Ciardullo
Robin Ciardullo*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802USA email: [email protected] Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although the method has no theoretical explanation, the [Oiii]λ5007Å planetary nebula luminosity function (PNLF) is an extremely valuable tool for obtaining accurate (< 10%) extragalactic distances out to ~ 18 Mpc. Because the PNLF works in large galaxies of all Hubble types, it is one of the best tools we have for cross-checking the results of other methods and identifying systematic offsets between the Population I and Population II distance ladders. We review the PNLF's calibration and show that the method's Cepheid-derived zero point is virtually identical to that inferred from measurements of the tip of the red giant branch. We then compare the PNLF to the surface brightness fluctuations method and demonstrate that the latter's calibration yields a distance scale that is ~ 15% larger than that of the PNLF. We argue that this offset is likely due to a number of factors, including the effects of reddening on both of the techniques. We conclude by discussing the use of the PNLF for supernovae Type Ia calibration and considering the outstanding problems associated with the method.

Keywords

distance scalegalaxies: distances and redshiftsplanetary nebulae: general
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S289: Advancing the Physics of Cosmic Distances , August 2012 , pp. 247 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Balona, L. A., Cunha, M. S., Kurtz, D. W., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakeslee, J. P., Cantiello, M., Mei, S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 724, 657Google Scholar
Blakeslee, J. P., Jordán, A., Mei, S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 694, 556Google Scholar
Ciardullo, R., Jacoby, G. H., Ford, H. C., et al. 1989a, ApJ, 339, 53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciardullo, R., Jacoby, G. H., & Ford, H. C. 1989b, ApJ, 344, 715Google Scholar
Ciardullo, R., Jacoby, G. H., & Harris, W. E. 1991, ApJ, 383, 487Google Scholar
Ciardullo, R., Jacoby, G. H., & Tonry, J. L. 1993, ApJ, 419, 479Google Scholar
Ciardullo, R., Feldmeier, J. J., Jacoby, G. H., et al. 2002, ApJ, 577, 31Google Scholar
Ciardullo, R., Sigurdsson, S., Feldmeier, J. J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 629, 499Google Scholar
Ciardullo, R., Durrell, P. R., Laychak, M. B., et al. 2004, ApJ, 614, 167Google Scholar
Clarkson, W. I., Sahu, K. C., Anderson, J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 37Google Scholar
Dobbie, P. D., Napiwotzki, R., Burleigh, M. R., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 2248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dopita, M. A., Jacoby, G. H., & Vassiliadis, E. 1992, ApJ, 389, 27Google Scholar
Feldmeier, J. J., Ciardullo, R., & Jacoby, G. H. 1997, ApJ, 479, 231Google Scholar
Feldmeier, J. J., Jacoby, G. H., & Phillips, M. M. 2007, ApJ, 657, 76Google Scholar
Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., et al. 1998, PASP, 110, 761Google Scholar
Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Gibson, B. K., et al. 2001, ApJ, 553, 47Google Scholar
Gronwall, C., Ciardullo, R., Hickey, T., et al. 2007, ApJ, 667, 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, H. C., Dahn, C. C., Canzian, B., et al. 2007, AJ, 133, 631Google Scholar
Herrmann, K. A., Ciardullo, R., Feldmeier, J. J., et al. 2008, ApJ, 683, 630Google Scholar
Herrmann, K. A. & Ciardullo, R. 2009, ApJ, 703, 894Google Scholar
Hicken, M., Wood-Vasey, W. M., Blondin, S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1097Google Scholar
Hui, X., Ford, H. C., Ciardullo, R., et al. 1993, ApJ, 414, 463Google Scholar
Iben, I. Jr. & Laughlin, G. 1989, ApJ, 341, 312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, G. H. 1989, ApJ, 339, 39Google Scholar
Jacoby, G. H., Ciardullo, R., & Ford, H. C. 1990, ApJ, 356, 332Google Scholar
Jacoby, G. H., Branch, D., Ciardullo, R., et al. 1992, PASP, 104, 599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J. B., Tonry, J. L., Barris, B. J., et al. 2003, ApJ, 583, 712Google Scholar
Johnson, L. C., Méndez, R. H., & Teodorescu, A. M. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1138Google Scholar
Kalirai, J. S., Hansen, B. M. S., Kelson, D. D., et al. 2008, ApJ, 676, 594Google Scholar
Kovacevic, A. V., Parker, Q. A., Jacoby, G. H., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, J. C., Warren, J. S., Rasio, F. A., et al. 2002, ApJ, 568, 939Google Scholar
Marigo, P., Girardi, L., Weiss, A., et al. 2004, A&A, 423, 995Google Scholar
Marín-Franch, A. & Aparicio, A. 2006, A&A, 450, 979Google Scholar
McCrea, W. H. 1964, MNRAS, 128, 147Google Scholar
McMillan, R., Ciardullo, R., & Jacoby, G. H. 1993, ApJ, 416, 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, R., Ciardullo, R., & Jacoby, G. H. 1995, AJ, 108, 1610Google Scholar
Méndez, R. H. & Soffner, T. 1997, A&A, 321, 898Google Scholar
Méndez, R. H., Riffeser, A., Kudritzki, R.-P., et al. 2001, ApJ, 563, 135Google Scholar
Moe, M. & De Marco, O. 2006, ApJ, 650, 916Google Scholar
Perinotto, M., Schönberner, D., Steffen, M., et al. 2004, ApJ, 414, 993Google Scholar
Phillips, J. P. 2004, MNRAS, 353, 589Google Scholar
Pottasch, S. R. 1990, A&A, 236, 231Google Scholar
Reid, W. A. & Parker, Q. A. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 1349Google Scholar
Sambhus, N., Gerhard, O., & Méndez, R. H. 2006, AJ, 131, 837Google Scholar
Schoenberner, D. 1983, ApJ, 272, 708Google Scholar
Schönberner, D., Jacob, R., Steffen, M., et al. 2007, A&A, 473, 467Google Scholar
Schönberner, D., Jacob, R., Sandin, C., et al. 2010, A&A, 523, A86Google Scholar
Siódmiak, N., Meixner, M., Ueta, T., et al. 2008, ApJ, 677, 382Google Scholar
Soker, N. 2006, ApJ, 645, L57Google Scholar
Teodorescu, A. M., Méndez, R. H., Bernardi, F., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 65Google Scholar
Teodorescu, A. M., Méndez, R. H., Saglia, R. P., et al. 2005, ApJ, 635, 290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, J. L., Dressler, A., Blakeslee, J. P., et al. 2001, ApJ, 546, 681Google Scholar
Trager, S. C., Faber, S. M., Worthey, G., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, 1645Google Scholar
Tully, R. B., Rizzi, L., Shaya, E. J., et al., 2009, AJ, 138, 323Google Scholar
Ueta, T., Meixner, M., & Bobrowsky, M. 2000, ApJ, 528, 861Google Scholar
Vassiliadis, E. & Wood, P. R. 1994, ApJS, 92, 125Google Scholar
Vazdekis, A., Peletier, R. F., Beckman, J. E., et al. 1997, ApJS, 111, 203Google Scholar
Windhorst, R. A., Taylor, V. A., Jansen, R. A., et al. 2002, ApJS, 143, 113Google Scholar