Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:35:00.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physics of the atmospheric escape driven by EUV photoionization heating: Classification of the hydrodynamic escape in close-in planets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2023

Hiroto Mitani Open the ORCID record for Hiroto Mitani [Opens in a new window] ,
Riouhei Nakatani  and
Naoki Yoshida
Hiroto Mitani
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033 email: [email protected]
Riouhei Nakatani
Affiliation:
RIKEN Cluster for Pioneering Research, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
Naoki Yoshida
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033 email: [email protected] Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), UT Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan Research Center for the Early Universe, School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The intense extreme ultraviolet radiation heats the upper atmosphere of close-in exoplanets and drives the atmospheric escape. The escaping process determines the planetary evolution of close-in planets. The mass loss rate depends on the UV flux at the planet. We introduce the relevant physical quantities which describe the dominant physics in the atmosphere. We find that the equilibrium temperature and the characteristic temperature determine whether the system becomes energy-limited or recombination-limited. We classify the observed close-in planets using the physical conditions. We also find that many of the Lyman-α absorptions detected planets receive intenser flux than the critical flux which can be determined from physical conditions. Our classification method can quantitatively reveal whether the EUV is not strong enough to drive the outflow or the Lyman- α absorption is not detected for some reason (e.g. stellar wind confinement). We also discuss the thermo-chemical structure of hydrodynamic simulations with the relevant physics.

Keywords

hydrodynamicsmethods: numericalplanets and satellites: atmospheresplanets and satellites: physical evolution
Type
Contributed Paper
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 17 , Symposium S370: Winds of Stars and Exoplanets , August 2021 , pp. 155 - 160
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Begelman, M. C., McKee, C. F., & Shields, G. A. 1983, ApJ, 271, 70. doi: 10.1086/161178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carolan, S., Vidotto, A. A., Plavchan, P., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, L53 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenreich, D., Bourrier, V., Wheatley, P. J., et al. 2015, Nature, 522, 459 10.1038/nature14501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erkaev, N. V., Kulikov, Y. N., Lammer, H., et al. 2007, A&A, 472, 329 10.1051/0004-6361:20066929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, B. J., Petigura, E. A., Howard, A. W., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 109 10.3847/1538-3881/aa80ebCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecavelier des Etangs, A., Bourrier, V., Wheatley, P. J., et al. 2012, A&A, 543, L4 10.1051/0004-6361/201219363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitani, H., Nakatani, R., and Yoshida, N. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 855 10.1093/mnras/stac556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray-Clay, R. A., Chiang, E. I., & Murray, N. 2009, ApJ, 693, 23 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J. E. & Wu, Y. 2017, ApJ, 847, 29 10.3847/1538-4357/aa890aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockcliffe, K. E., Newton, E. R., Youngblood, A., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 116 10.3847/1538-3881/ac126fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanz-Forcada, J., Micela, G., Ribas, I., et al. 2011, A&A, 532, A6 10.1051/0004-6361/201116594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, J., Dedieu, C., Le Sidaner, P., et al. 2011, A&A, 532, A79 10.1051/0004-6361/201116713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathi, A., Kratter, K. M., Murray-Clay, R. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, 173 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal-Madjar, A., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., Désert, J.-M., et al. 2003, Nature, 422, 143 10.1038/nature01448CrossRefGoogle Scholar