Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:15:54.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parallels among the “music scores” of solar cycles, space weather and Earth's climate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2012

Zoltán Kolláth
Affiliation:
Konkoly Observatory, Budapest, Hungary email: [email protected]
Katalin Oláh
Affiliation:
Konkoly Observatory, Budapest, Hungary email: [email protected]
Lidia van Driel-Gesztelyi
Affiliation:
Konkoly Observatory, Budapest, Hungary email: [email protected] Observatoire de Paris, LESIA, CNRS, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Paris-Diderot, Meudon, France University College London, Mullard Space Science Laboratory, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Solar variability and its effects on the physical variability of our (space) environment produces complex signals. In the indicators of solar activity at least four independent cyclic components can be identified, all of them with temporal variations in their timescales.

Time-frequency distributions (see Kolláth & Oláh 2009) are perfect tools to disclose the “music scores” in these complex time series. Special features in the time-frequency distributions, like frequency splitting, or modulations on different timescales provide clues, which can reveal similar trends among different indices like sunspot numbers, interplanetary magnetic field strength in the Earth's neighborhood and climate data.

On the pseudo-Wigner Distribution (PWD) the frequency splitting of all the three main components (the Gleissberg and Schwabe cycles, and an ≈5.5 year signal originating from cycle asymmetry, i.e. the Waldmeier effect) can be identified as a “bubble” shaped structure after 1950. The same frequency splitting feature can also be found in the heliospheric magnetic field data and the microwave radio flux.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Butler, C. J., García-Suárez, A. M., Coughlin, A. D., & Morrel, C. 2005, Int. J. Climatol., 25, 1055 (see also: Armagh Observatory Climate Series Vol. 2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, R. & Schüssler, M. 2007, ApJ, 659, 801Google Scholar
Cohen, L. 1995, Time-Frequency Analysis, (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs).Google Scholar
Kolláth, Z. & Oláh, K. 2009, A&A, 501, 695Google Scholar
Petrovay, K. 2009, in Kosovichev, A. G., Andrei, A. H. & Rozelot, J.-P. (Eds) Solar and Stellar Variability: Impact on Earth and Planets Proc IAU Symp., No. 264, p. 150.Google Scholar
Schove, D. J. 1955, J. Geophys Res., 60, 127Google Scholar
Smith, T. M., Reynolds, R. W., Peterson, T. C., & Lawrimore, J. 2008, J. Climate, 21, 2283Google Scholar
Svalgaard, L. & Cliver, E. W. 2010, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A09111Google Scholar
Waldmeier, M. 1935, Mitt. Eidgen. Sternw. Zurich, 14, 105Google Scholar
Wigner, J. 1932, Phys. Rev., 40, 749CrossRefGoogle Scholar