Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:39:12.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orbital Motion and Multi-Wavelength Monitoring of LkCa15 b

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2014

Michael J. Ireland  and
Adam L. Kraus
Michael J. Ireland
Affiliation:
Australian Astronomical Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping NSW 1710, Australia email: [email protected] Department of Physics & Astronomy, Macquarie University, NSW 2109Australia
Adam L. Kraus
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Texas at Austin, 2515 Speedway, Stop C1400 Austin, Texas 78712-1205, USA email: [email protected] Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As part of a deep multi-year non-redundant aperture mask infrared imaging campaign observing transition disks, we present multi-epoch monitoring of the resolved emission seen within the disk gap of LkCa 15. Orbital motion of both the central source and extended lobes as presented in Kraus and Ireland (2012) is clearly detected at the level of ~4 degrees/year (deprojected), in both K and L'-bands. Based on these data as well as single-epoch H and M bands epochs, we present two models for the central source - thermal emission as a planetary accretion signature and scattering. The thermal emission model is preferred.

Keywords

planets and satellites: formationstars: individual: LkCa 15instrumentation: high angular resolutiontechniques: image processing
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S299: Exploring the Formation and Evolution of Planetary Systems , June 2013 , pp. 199 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Dodson-Robinson, S. E. & Salyk, C. 2011, ApJ, 738, 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ireland, M. 2012, in Proc. SPIE Vol. 8447, 79Google Scholar
Ireland, M. J. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 1718Google Scholar
Ireland, M. J. & Kraus, A. L. 2008, ApJ, 678, L59Google Scholar
Ireland, M. J., Monnier, J. D., & Thureau, N. 2006, in Proc. SPIE Vol. 6268, 58IGoogle Scholar
Kraus, A. L. & Ireland, M. J. 2012, ApJ, 745, 5Google Scholar
Lafrenière, D., Doyon, R., Marois, C., Nadeau, D., Oppenheimer, B. R., Roche, P. F., Rigaut, F., Graham, J. R., Jayawardhana, R., Johnstone, D., Kalas, P. G., Macintosh, B., & Racine, R. 2007, ApJ, 670, 1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marley, M. S., Fortney, J. J., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2007, ApJ, 655, 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinache, F. 2010, ApJ, 724, 464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355Google Scholar
Simon, M., Dutrey, A., & Guilloteau, S. 2000, ApJ, 545, 1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soummer, R., Pueyo, L., & Larkin, J. 2012, ApJ, 755, L28Google Scholar