Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:28:18.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the importance of the equation of state for the neutrino-driven supernova explosion mechanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Yudai Suwa
Yudai Suwa*
Affiliation:
Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Oiwake-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan; email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present two-dimensional numerical simulations of core-collapse supernova including multi-energy neutrino radiative transfer. We aim to examine the influence of the equation of state (EOS) for the dense nuclear matter. We employ four sets of EOSs, namely, those by Lattimer and Swesty (LS) and Shen et al., which became standard EOSs in the core-collapse supernova community. We reconfirm that not every EOS produces an explosion in spherical symmetry, which is consistent with previous works. In two-dimensional simulations, we find that the structure of the accretion flow is significantly different between LS EOS and Shen EOS, inducing an even qualitatively different evolution of the shock wave, namely, the LS EOS leads to shock propagation beyond 2000 km from the center, while the Shen EOS shows only oscillations within 500 km. The possible origins of the difference are discussed.

Keywords

equation of state — hydrodynamics — neutrinos — stars: neutron — supernovae: general
Type
Poster Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 7 , Symposium S279: Death of Massive Stars: Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts , April 2011 , pp. 397 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Lattimer, J. M. & Swesty, F. D. 1991, Nuclear Physics A, 535, 331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebendörfer, M., Whitehouse, S. C., & Fischer, T. 2009, Astrophys. J., 698, 1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marek, A. & Janka, H. 2009, Astrophys. J., 694, 664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, H., Toki, H., Oyamatsu, K., & Sumiyoshi, K. 1998, Nucl. Phys., A637, 435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, J. M. & Norman, M. L. 1992, Astrophys. J., 80, 753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suwa, Y. et al. 2010, PASJ, 62, L49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suwa, Y., Kotake, K., Takiwaki, T., Liebendörfer, M., & Sato, K. 2011, Astrophys. J., 738, 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woosley, S. E. & Weaver, T. A. 1995, Astrophys. J., 101, 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar