Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:48:04.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observational signs of planet infall and Roche lobe overflow outward migration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2011

Stuart F. Taylor
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy and Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, 101 Section 2 Kuang Fu Road, Hsinchu, Taiwan30013 email: [email protected], [email protected] Global Telescope Science Group, Los Angeles, California, USA Eureka Scientific, Inc., Oakland, California, USA
Ing-Guey Jiang
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy and Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, 101 Section 2 Kuang Fu Road, Hsinchu, Taiwan30013 email: [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Outward migration of planets due to Roche lobe overflow may play an important role in producing the presently observed distribution of planet parameters. We suggest that many of the currently known short period planets may have already migrated into the Roche distance from the star, and then deposited at their current semi-major axes by being migrated outwards due to angular momentum transfer from an episode of Roche lobe overflow (RLO). This RLO outward migration (RLOOM) could be sustained in the region where planetary radius increases with decreasing mass. We are modeling how RLOOM may leave what kind of planet parameter statistics. This modeling seeks to predict what observable signs of RLOOM there may be. Overflow of planetary mass may leave behind characteristic hot dust and gas as well as produce luminous signatures.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Chang, S.-H., Gu, P.-G., & Bodenheimer, P. H. 2010, ApJ, 708, 1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabrycky, D. 2010, This volumeGoogle Scholar
Pont, F. 2010, MNRAS, 396, 1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, P.-G. 2010, Nature, 465, 300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, P.-G., Lin, D. N. C., & Bodenheimer, P. H. 2003, ApJ, 588, 509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, P-.G., Bodenheimer, P. H., & Lin, D. N. C. 2004, ApJ, 608, 1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, N. C. & Mayor, M. 2003, in: Monteiro, M. (ed.), The Unsolved Universe: Challenges for the Future, JENAM 2002 (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), p. 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S. F. 2010, submitted to Icarus, arXiv:1009.4221Google Scholar
Trilling, D. E., Benz, W., Guillot, T., Lunine, J. I., Hubbard, W. B., & Burrows, A. 1998, ApJ, 500, 428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zapolsky, H. S. & Salpeter, E. E. 1969, ApJ, 158, 809CrossRefGoogle Scholar