Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:21:45.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-thermal radio emission from colliding-wind binaries: modelling Cyg OB2 No. 8A and No. 9

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2011

Delia Volpi ,
Ronny Blomme ,
Michael De Becker  and
Gregor Rauw
Delia Volpi
Affiliation:
Royal Observatory of Belgium, Ringlaan 3, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium, email: [email protected]
Ronny Blomme
Affiliation:
Royal Observatory of Belgium, Ringlaan 3, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium, email: [email protected]
Michael De Becker
Affiliation:
Institut d'Astrophysique, Université de Liège, Allée du 6 Août, 17, Bât B5c, B-4000 Liège (Sart-Tilman), Belgium Observatoire de Haute-Provence, F-04870 Saint-Michel l'Observatoire, France
Gregor Rauw
Affiliation:
Institut d'Astrophysique, Université de Liège, Allée du 6 Août, 17, Bât B5c, B-4000 Liège (Sart-Tilman), Belgium
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Some OB stars show variable non-thermal radio emission. The non-thermal emission is due to synchrotron radiation that is emitted by electrons accelerated to high energies. The electron acceleration occurs at strong shocks created by the collision of radiatively-driven stellar winds in binary systems. Here we present results of our modelling of two colliding wind systems: Cyg OB2 No. 8A and Cyg OB2 No. 9.

Keywords

plasmasradiation mechanisms: nonthermalmethods: numericalbinaries: spectroscopicstars: early-typestars: windsoutflows
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 6 , Symposium S272: Active OB stars: structure, evolution, mass loss, and critical limits , July 2010 , pp. 638 - 639
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Adam, J. 1990, A&A, 240, 541Google Scholar
Antokhin, I. I., Owocki, S. P., & Brown, J. C. 2004, ApJ, 611, 434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Becker, M., Rauw, G., Sana, H., Pollock, A. M. T. et al. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomme, R., De Becker, M., Volpi, D., & Rauw, G. 2010, A&A 519A, 111Google Scholar
Eichler, D. & Usov, V. 1993, ApJ, 402, 271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, F., Schaerer, D., & Hillier, D. J. 2005, A&A, 436, 1049Google Scholar
Nazé, Y., Damerdji, Y., Rauw, G., Kiminki, D. C. et al. 2010, ApJ, 719, 634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Loo, S., Blomme, R., Dougherty, S. M., & Runacres, M. C. 2008, A&A, 483, 585Google Scholar
Vink, J. S., de Koter, A., & Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. 2001, A&A, 369, 574Google Scholar