Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:00:27.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new view on planet formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2011

Sergei Nayakshin
Sergei Nayakshin*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The standard picture of planet formation posits that giant gas planets are over-grown rocky planets massive enough to attract enormous gas atmospheres. It has been shown recently that the opposite point of view is physically plausible: the rocky terrestrial planets are former giant planet embryos dried of their gas “to the bone” by the influences of the parent star. Here we provide a brief overview of this “Tidal Downsizing” hypothesis in the context of the Solar System structure.

Keywords

planetary systemsplanets and satellites: formation
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 6 , Symposium S276: The Astrophysics of Planetary Systems: Formation, Structure, and Dynamical Evolution , October 2010 , pp. 101 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Boley, A. C., Mejía, A. C., Durisen, R. H., Cai, K., Pickett, M. K., & D'Alessio, P. 2006, ApJ, 651, 517Google Scholar
Boley, A. C., Hayfield, T., Mayer, L. & Durisen, R. H., 2010, Icarus, 207, 509Google Scholar
Boss, A. P. 1998, ApJ, 503, 923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boss, A. P., Wetherill, G. W. & Haghighipour, N. 2002, Icarus, 156, 291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cha, S.-H. & Nayakshin, S. 2011, MNRAS, in press (arXiv:1010.1489)Google Scholar
Donnison, J. R. & Williams, I. P. 1975, MNRAS, 172, 257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldreich, P. & Tremaine, S. 1980, ApJ, 241, 425Google Scholar
Handbury, M. J. & Williams, I. P. 1975, AP&SS, 38, 29Google Scholar
Ida, S. & Lin, D. N. C. 2008, ApJ, 685, 584Google Scholar
Johansen, A., Oishi, J. S., Low, M., Klahr, H., Henning, T. & Youdin, A. 2007, Nature, 448, 1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, G. P. 1951, in 50th Anniversary of the Yerkes Observatory and Half a Century of Progress in Astrophysics, edited by Hynek, J. A., 357–+Google Scholar
McCrea, W. H. 1960, Royal Society of London Proceedings Series A, 256, 245Google Scholar
McCrea, W. H. & Williams, I. P., 1965, Royal Society of London Proceedings Series A, 287, 143Google Scholar
Mizuno, H. 1980, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 64, 544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayakshin, S. 2010a, MNRAS, 408, 2381Google Scholar
Nayakshin, S. 2010b, MNRAS, 408, L36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayakshin, S. 2011a, MNRAS, 410, L1Google Scholar
Nayakshin, S. 2011b, MNRAS, 413, 1462Google Scholar
Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., et al. 1996, Icarus, 124, 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafikov, R. R. 2005, ApJL, 621, L69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safronov, V. S. 1969, Evoliutsiia doplanetnogo oblaka.Google Scholar
Shakura, N. I. & Sunyaev, R. A., 1973, A&A, 24, 337Google Scholar
Vorobyov, E. I. & Basu, S. 2005, ApJL, 633, L137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorobyov, E. I. & Basu, S. 2006, ApJ, 650, 956Google Scholar
Vorobyov, E. I. & Basu, S. 2010, ApJ, 713, L133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, MNRAS, 180, 57Google Scholar
Weidenschilling, S. J. 1980, Icarus, 44, 172Google Scholar
Wetherill, G. W. 1990, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 18, 205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youdin, A. N. & Goodman, J. 2005, ApJ, 620, 459Google Scholar