Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:52:12.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Technique to Provide Realistic Input to CME Forecasting Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2018

Nat Gopalswamy Open the ORCID record for Nat Gopalswamy [Opens in a new window] ,
Sachiko Akiyama ,
Seiji Yashiro  and
Hong Xie
Nat Gopalswamy
Affiliation:
Solar Physics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA email: [email protected]
Sachiko Akiyama
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, The Catholic University of America, Washington DC 20064, USA
Seiji Yashiro
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, The Catholic University of America, Washington DC 20064, USA
Hong Xie
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, The Catholic University of America, Washington DC 20064, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We report on a technique to construct a flux rope (FR) from eruption data at the Sun. The technique involves line-of-sight magnetic fields, post-eruption arcades in the corona, and white-light coronal mass ejections (CMEs) so that the FR geometric and magnetic properties can be fully defined in addition to the kinematic properties. We refer to this FR as FRED (Flux Rope from Eruption Data). We illustrate the FRED construction using the 2012 July 12 eruption and compare the coronal and interplanetary properties of the FR. The results indicate that the FRED input should help make realistic predictions of the components of the FR magnetic field in the heliosphere.

Keywords

coronal mass ejectionflux ropereconnection
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 13 , Symposium S335: Space Weather of the Heliosphere: Processes and Forecasts , July 2017 , pp. 258 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Bothmer, V. & Schwenn, R. 1998, Annales Geophysicae, 16, 1Google Scholar
Dasso, S., Mandrini, C. H., Démoulin, P. & Farrugia, C. J. 2003, JGR, 108, 1362Google Scholar
Démoulin, P., Janvier, M. & Dasso, S. 2016, SolPhys, 291, 531Google Scholar
Gopalswamy, N., Akiyama, S., Yashiro, S., Michalek, G. & Lepping, R. 2008, JASTP, 70, 245Google Scholar
Gopalswamy, N. & Yashiro, S. 2011, ApJ, 736, L17Google Scholar
Gopalswamy, N., Mäkelä, P., Xie, H. & Yashiro, S. 2013, Space Weather, 11, 661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopalswamy, N., Xie, H., Akiyama, S., Mäkelä, P. A. & Yashiro, S. 2014, Earth, Planets, and Space, 66, 104Google Scholar
Gopalswamy, N., Yashiro, S., Akiyama, S. & Xie, H. 2017a, SolPhys, 292, 65Google Scholar
Gopalswamy, N., Akiyama, S., Yashiro, S. & Xie, H. 2017b, JASTP, arXiv:1705.08912Google Scholar
Hess, P. & Zhang, J. 2014, ApJ, 792, 49Google Scholar
Hu, Q., Qiu, J., Dasgupta, B., Khare, A. & Webb, G. M. 2014, ApJ, 793, 53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, H., Liu, Y. D., Wang, R., Möstl, C. & Yang, Z. 2016, ApJ, 829, 97Google Scholar
Jin, M., Manchester, W. B., van der Holst, B., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 173Google Scholar
Kay, C., Opher, M. & Evans, R. M. 2015, ApJ, 805, 168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krall, J., St.Cyr, O. C. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemen, J. R., Title, A. M., Akin, D. J., et al. 2012, SolPhys, 275, 17Google Scholar
Longcope, D., Beveridge, C., Qiu, J., et al. 2007, SolPhys, 244, 45Google Scholar
Lundquist, S. 1951, Phys. Rev., 83, 307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, H. & Martin, S. F. 2000, AdSpR, 26, 469Google Scholar
Möstl, C., Amla, K., Hall, J. R., et al. 2014, ApJ, 787, 119Google Scholar
Nindos, A., Zhang, J. & Zhang, H. 2003, ApJ, 594, 1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odstrčil, D. & Pizzo, V. J. 1999, JGR, 104, 483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patsourakos, S., Georgoulis, M. K., Vourlidas, A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, 14Google Scholar
Pesnell, W. D., Thompson, B. J. & Chamberlin, P. C. 2012, SolPhys, 275, 3Google Scholar
Qiu, J., Hu, Q., Howard, T. A. & Yurchyshyn, V. B. 2007,ApJ, 659, 758Google Scholar
Scherrer, P. H., Schou, J., Bush, R. I., et al. 2012, SolPhys, 275, 207Google Scholar
Shen, F., Shen, C., Zhang, J., et al. 2014, JGR, 119, 7128Google Scholar
Shiota, D., Kataoka, R., Miyoshi, Y., et al. 2014, Space Weather, 12, 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temmer, M., Veronig, A. M., Gopalswamy, N. & Yashiro, S. 2011, SolPhys, 273, 421Google Scholar
Thernisien, A. 2011, ApJS, 194, 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C.-C. & Lepping, R. P. 2002, JGR, 107, 1346Google Scholar