Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:03:33.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Constraints on Preferred Frame Effects from Binary Pulsars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2013

Lijing Shao ,
Norbert Wex  and
Michael Kramer
Lijing Shao
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, GermanySchool of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China email: [email protected]
Norbert Wex
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany email: [email protected]
Michael Kramer
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, GermanyJodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, M13 9PL, UK email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Preferred frame effects (PFEs) are predicted by a number of alternative gravity theories which include vector or additional tensor fields, besides the canonical metric tensor. In the framework of parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism, we investigate PFEs in the orbital dynamics of binary pulsars, characterized by the two strong-field PPN parameters, and . In the limit of a small orbital eccentricity, and contributions decouple. By utilizing recent radio timing results and optical observations of PSRs J1012+5307 and J1738+0333, we obtained the best limits of and in the strong-field regime. The constraint on also surpasses its counterpart in the weak-field regime.

Keywords

Gravitationpulsars: generalpulsars: individual (J1012+5307, J1738+0333)
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S291: Neutron Stars and Pulsars: Challenges and Opportunities after 80 years , August 2012 , pp. 496 - 498
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Antoniadis, J., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Koester, D., Freire, P. C. C., Wex, N., Tauris, T. M., Kramer, M., & Bassa, C. G. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 3316Google Scholar
Damour, T. & Esposito-Farèse, G. 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 46, 4128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, P. C. C., Wex, N., Esposito-Farèse, G., Verbiest, J. P. W., Bailes, M., Jacoby, B. A., Kramer, M., Stairs, I. H., Antoniadis, J. & Janssen, G. H. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 3328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M., Stairs, I. H., Manchester, R. N., McLaughlin, M. A., Lyne, A. G., Ferdman, R. D., Burgay, M., Lorimer, D. R. Possenti, D'Amico, N., Sarkissian, J. M., Hobbs, G. B., Reynolds, J. E., Freire, P. C. C., & Camilo, F. 2006, Science, 314, 97Google Scholar
Lazaridis, K., Wex, N., Jessner, A., Kramer, M., Stappers, B. W., Janssen, G. H., Desvignes, G., Purver, M. B., Cognard, I., Theureau, G., Lyne, A. G. Jordan. A., & Zensus, J. A. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorimer, D. R. & Kramer, M. 2005, Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Müller, J., Williams, J. G., & Turyshev, S. G. 2008, in: Dittus, H., Lammerzahl, C., & Turyshev, S. G. (eds.), Lasers, Clocks and Drag-Free Control: Exploration of Relativistic Gravity in Space 349 (Astrophysics and Space Science Library: Springer), p. 457Google Scholar
Nan, R., Li, D., Jin, C., Wang, Q., Zhu, L., Zhu, W., Zhang, H., Yue, Y., & Qian, L. 2011, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 20, 989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordtvedt, K. 1987, ApJ, 320, 871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordtvedt, K. & Will, C. M. 1972, ApJ, 177, 775Google Scholar
Shao, L. & Wex, N. 2012, Class. Quantum Grav., accepted [arXiv:1209.4503]Google Scholar
Smits, R., Kramer, M., Stappers, B., Lorimer, D. R., Cordes, J., & Faulkner, A. 2009, A&A, 493, 1161Google Scholar
Stairs, I. H. 2003, “Testing General Relativity with Pulsar Timing”, Living Rev. Relativity 6, 5. URL (cited on 2012-09-11): http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2003-5Google Scholar
Wex, N. 2000, in: Kramer, M., Wex, N., & Wielebinski, R. (eds.), IAU Colloq. 177: Pulsar Astronomy – 2000 and Beyond 202 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series: San Francisco), p. 113Google Scholar
Wex, N. & Kramer, M. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Will, C. M. 1993, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Will, C. M. 2006, “The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment”, Living Rev. Relativity 9, 3. URL (cited on 2012-09-06): http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2006-3Google Scholar
Will, C. M. & Nordtvedt, K. 1972, ApJ, 177, 757Google Scholar