Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:47:40.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The nature of the unassociated 2FGL sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2015

T. Pursimo
Affiliation:
Nordic Optical Telescope, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain email: [email protected]
R. Ojha
Affiliation:
UMBC/NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA
E. Ferrara
Affiliation:
UMBC/NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA
F. Acero
Affiliation:
Laboratoire AIM, CEA Saclay, France
H. Johnston
Affiliation:
Sydney Institute for Astronomy, Australia
O. Titov
Affiliation:
Geoscience Australia, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The majority of Fermi-LAT detected (2FGL) sources are AGN, mostly blazars. However, the second largest category in the 2FGL are unassociated sources (~30% or 575 sources), whose multi-wavelength counterpart is either inconclusive or absent. Follow-up observations and archival data at X-ray, optical, and radio frequencies suggest that many unassociated 2FGL sources are strong candidates to be AGN. Typical observed characteristics of 2FGL detected AGN include variability at all frequencies and a spectral energy distribution (SED) with two “bumps”; a low-frequency synchrotron peak in the radio to optical/X-ray region and a high-frequency peak, possibly due to synchrotron self-Compton or Inverse Compton processes, that extends up to TeV energies. We present optical follow-up observations of a sample of Fermi unassociated sources with one or more potential X-ray counterparts detected within the LAT error circle.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Acero, F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackermann, M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massaro, F., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 138Google Scholar
Nolan, P. L., et al. 2012, ApJS, 199, 31Google Scholar
Paggi, A., et al. 2013, ApJS, 209, 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar