Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:49:49.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mutual geometry of confocal Keplerian orbits: uncertainty of the MOID and search for virtual PHAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Giovanni F. Gronchi
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Pisa, Largo B. Pontecorvo 5, 56127 Pisa, Italy email: [email protected]
Giacomo Tommei
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Pisa, Largo B. Pontecorvo 5, 56127 Pisa, Italy email: [email protected]
Andrea Milani
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Pisa, Largo B. Pontecorvo 5, 56127 Pisa, Italy email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Minimum Orbit Intersection Distance (MOID) between two confocal Keplerian orbits is a useful tool to know if two celestial bodies can collide or undergo a very close approach. We describe some results and open problems on the number of local minimum points of the distance between two points on the two orbits and the position of such points with respect to the mutual nodes. The errors affecting the observations of an asteroid result in uncertainty in its orbit determination and, consequently, uncertainty in the MOID. The latter is always positive and is not regular where it vanishes; this prevents us from considering it as a Gaussian random variable, and from computing its covariance by standard tools. In a recent work we have introduced a regularization of the maps giving the local minimum values of the distance between two orbits. It uses a signed value of the distance, with the sign given to the MOID according to a simple orientation property. The uncertainty of the regularized MOID has been computed for a large database of orbits. In this way we have searched for Virtual PHAs, i.e. asteroids which can belong to the category of PHAs (Potentially Hazardous Asteroids) if the errors in the orbit determination are taken into account. Among the Virtual PHAs we have found objects that are not even NEA, according to their nominal orbit.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Bini, D. A. 1997, Numer. Algorithms 13, 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanno, C. 2000, Astron. Astrophys. 360, 416Google Scholar
Bowell, E. & Muinonen, K., 1994, in: Gehrels, T. (eds.), Hazards due to comets & asteroids, (Tucson: The University of Arizona Press), p. 149Google Scholar
Carpino, M., Milani, A. & Chesley, S. R. 2003, Icarus 166, 248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D., Little, J. & O'Shea, D. 1992, Ideals, Varieties and Algorithms, Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dybczynski, P. A., Jopek, T. J. & Serafin, R. A. 1986, Celest. Mech. & Dynam. Astron. 38, 345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronchi, G. F. 2002, SIAM Journ. Sci. Comp. 24, 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronchi, G. F. 2005, Celest. Mech. & Dynam. Ast. 93, 297Google Scholar
Gronchi, G. F. & Tommei, G. 2007, DCDS-B 7, 755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoots, F. R. 1984, Celest. Mech. & Dynam. Astron. 33, 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jazwinski, A. H. 1970, Stochastic processes and filtering theory, Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Kholshevnikov, K. V. & Vassiliev, N. 1999, Celest. Mech. & Dynam. Astron. 75, 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milani, A. 1999, Icarus 137, 269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milani, A., Sansaturio, M. E., Tommei, G., Arratia, O. & Chesley, S. R. 2005, Astron. Astrophys. 431, 729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milani, A., Gronchi, G. F. & Knežević, Z. 2006, Earth, Moon & Planets, in pressGoogle Scholar
Milnor, J. 1963, Morse theory, Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitarski, G. 1968, Acta Astron. 18, 171Google Scholar
Wetherill, G. W. 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 2429CrossRefGoogle Scholar