Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:30:56.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

(Mostly) dormant comets in the NEO population and the meteoroid streams that they crumble into

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Peter Jenniskens*
Affiliation:
SETI Institute, 515 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View, CA 94043 email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many of our annual showers do not have active parent comets. In recent years, minor planets have been identified that move among the meteoroids streams. Some streams, such as the Quadrantids, Geminids, and Sextantids, are in such unusual orbits that the probability of a chance association is only of order 1 in 106. The streams identify those objects as dormant comet nuclei. Other streams, such as the Phoenicids and α-Capricornids are associated with minor planets that were found to be weakly active at their last perihelion passage. All the streams investigated so far are young, less than 2,000 years old, and can not have been created in the classical sense of meteoroids being ejected from the comet nucleus by water vapor drag. Instead, these (mostly) dormant comets lost fragments at some point in the past, which crumbled into meteoroid streams. Scars of such events are now identified on the surface of active Jupiter family comets 9P/Tempel 1 and 81P/Wild 2. Thus, the meteor showers on Earth bear witness to what is the dominant mass-loss mechanism of comets in the inner solar system, a process that can account for much of the zodiacal cloud dust and the zodiacal dust bands.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

A'Hearn, M.F., Belton, M.J.S., Delamere, W.A., Kissel, J., Klaasen, K.P., McFadden, L.A., Meech, K.J., Melosh, H.J., Schultz, P.H., Sunshine, J.M., Thomas, P.C., Veverka, J., Yeomans, D.K., Baca, M.W., Busko, I., Crockett, C.J., Collins, S.M., Desnoyer, M., Eberhardy, C.A., Ernst, C.M., Farnham, T.L., Feaga, L., Groussin, O., Hampton, D., Ipatov, S.I., Li, J.-Y., Lindler, D., Lisse, C.M., Mastrodemos, N., Owen, W.M., Richardson, J.E., Wellnitz, D.D. & White, R.L. 2005, Science 310, 258Google Scholar
Clube, S.V.M. & Napier, W.M. 1984, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 211, 953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafson, B.A.S. 1989, Astron. Astrophys. 225, 533Google Scholar
Hughes, D.W. 1993, in: Stohl, J. & Williams, I.P. (eds.), Meteoroids and their Parent Bodies (Bratislava: Astron. Inst. Slovak Acad. Sci.), p. 15Google Scholar
Jenniskens, P. 2003, IAUC 8252Google Scholar
Jenniskens, P., Betlem, H., de Lignie, M., Langbroek, M. & van Vliet, M. 1997, Astron. Astrophys. 327, 1242Google Scholar
Jenniskens, P. 2004, Astron. J. 127, 3018Google Scholar
Jenniskens, P. & Lyytinen, E 2005, Astron. J. 130, 1286Google Scholar
Jenniskens, P. 2006a, Meteor Showers and their Parent Comets (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Jenniskens, P. 2006b, in: Graps, A. (ed.), Proceedings of the “Dust in Planetary Systems” workshop, Kuaui, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, D. 2006, Astron. J. 131, 2327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kracht, R., Meyer, M., Hammer, D., Marsden, B.G. & Seargent, D.A.J. 2002, MPEC 2002-E25Google Scholar
Marsden, B.G. 2004, MPEC 2004-X73Google Scholar
Ohtsuka, K., 2005 CBET 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekanina, Z. & Chodas, P.W. 2005, Astron. J. Suppl. Ser. 161, 551Google Scholar
Whipple, F.L. 1951, Astrophys. J. 113, 464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipple, F.L. 1983, IAUC 3881, 1Google Scholar