Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T13:12:40.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monte Carlo Simulations of Star Clusters with Primordial Binaries. Comparison with N-body Simulations and Observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

Mirek Giersz  and
Douglas C. Heggie
Mirek Giersz
Affiliation:
Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland email: [email protected]
Douglas C. Heggie
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, School of Mathematics and Maxwell Institute of Mathematical Sciences, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, UK email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We outline the steps needed in to calibrate the Monte Carlo code in order to perform large scale simulations of real globular clusters. We calibrate the results against N-body simulations for N = 2500, 10000 and for the old open cluster M67. The calibration is done by choosing appropriate free code parameters.

Keywords

stellar dynamicsmethods: numericalstars: evolutionbinaries: generalopen clusters and associations:individual:M67
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S246: Dynamical Evolution of Dense Stellar Systems , September 2007 , pp. 99 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Baumgardt, H. 2001, MNRAS 325, 1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonatto, C. & Bica, E. 2005, A&A 937, 483Google Scholar
Drukier, G. A. 1993, MNRAS 265, 773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giersz, M. 2006, MNRAS 371, 484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giersz, M. & Heggie, D. C. 1994, MNRAS 268, 257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giersz, M. & Heggie, D. C. 2003, MNRAS 339, 486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabhorn, R. P., Cohn, H. N., Lugger, P. M., & Murphy, B. W. 1992, ApJ 392, 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heggie, D. C., Portegies Zwart, S. & Hurley, J. R. 2006, New Astron. 12, 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hénon, M. H. 1971, Ap&SS 14, 151Google Scholar
Hénon, M. H. 1975, in: Hayli, A., (ed.), Dynamics of Stellar Systems, Proc. IAU Symposium No. 69, (Reidel: Dordrecht), p. 133Google Scholar
Hurley, J. R., Pols, O. R., & Taut, C. A. 2000, MNRAS 315, 543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, J. R., Taut, C. A., & Pols, O. R. 2002, MNRAS 329, 897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, J. R., Pols, O. R., Aarseth, S. J., & Taut, C. A. 2005, MNRAS 363, 293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meylan, G. & Heggie, D. C. 1997, A&AR 8, 1Google Scholar
Montgomery, K. A., Marschall, L. A., & Janes, K. A. 1993, AJ 106, 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, B. W., Moore, C. A., Trotter, T. E., Cohn, H. N., & Lugger, P. M. 1998, BAAS 30, 1335Google Scholar
Stodółkiewicz, J. S. 1986, AcA 36, 19Google Scholar