Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:02:45.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling magnetized star-planet interactions: boundary conditions effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2014

Antoine Strugarek
Affiliation:
Département de physique, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128 Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC H3C-3J7, Canada email: [email protected] Laboratoire AIM Paris-Saclay, CEA/Irfu Université Paris-Diderot CNRS/INSU, F-91191Gif-sur-Yvette
Allan Sacha Brun
Affiliation:
Laboratoire AIM Paris-Saclay, CEA/Irfu Université Paris-Diderot CNRS/INSU, F-91191Gif-sur-Yvette
Sean P. Matt
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Exeter, Exeter EX2 4QL, UK
Victor Reville
Affiliation:
Laboratoire AIM Paris-Saclay, CEA/Irfu Université Paris-Diderot CNRS/INSU, F-91191Gif-sur-Yvette
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We model the magnetized interaction between a star and a close-in planet (SPMIs), using global, magnetohydrodynamic numerical simulations. In this proceedings, we study the effects of the numerical boundary conditions at the stellar surface, where the stellar wind is driven, and in the planetary interior. We show that is it possible to design boundary conditions that are adequate to obtain physically realistic, steady-state solutions for cases with both magnetized and unmagnetized planets. This encourages further development of numerical studies, in order to better constrain and undersand SPMIs, as well as their effects on the star-planet rotational evolution.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Barnes, R., Meadows, V. S., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., et al. 2011, 16th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, 448, 391Google Scholar
Cohen, O., Drake, J. J., Kashyap, V. L., Sokolov, I. V., & Gombosi, T. I. 2010, ApJ, 723, L64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, O., Kashyap, V. L., Drake, J. J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuntz, M., Saar, S. H., & Musielak, Z. E. 2000, ApJ, 533, L151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donati, J.-F., Moutou, C., Fares, R., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fares, R., Donati, J.-F., Moutou, C., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 409Google Scholar
Goldreich, P. & Lynden-Bell, D. 1969, ApJ, 156, 59Google Scholar
Ip, W.-H., Kopp, A., & Hu, J.-H. 2004, ApJ, 602, L53Google Scholar
Jardine, M. & Collier Cameron, A. 2008, A&A, 490, 843Google Scholar
Kasting, J. F., Whitmire, D. P., & Reynolds, R. T. 1993, Icarus, 101, 108Google Scholar
Keppens, R. & Goedbloed, J. P. 2000, ApJ, 530, 1036Google Scholar
Kivelson, M. G., Bagenal, F., Kurth, W. S., et al. 2004, In: Jupiter. The planet, 513Google Scholar
Laine, R. O. & Lin, D. N. C. 2011, ApJ, 745, 2Google Scholar
Laine, R. O., Lin, D. N. C., & Dong, S. 2008, ApJ, 685, 521Google Scholar
Lanza, A. F. 2008, A&A, 487, 1163Google Scholar
Lanza, A. F. 2010, A&A, 512, 77Google Scholar
Lanza, A. F. 2013, A&A, 557, 31Google Scholar
Lovelace, R. V. E., Mehanian, C., Mobarry, C. M., & Sulkanen, M. E. 1986, ApJS, 62, 1Google Scholar
Matt, S. & Balick, B. 2004, ApJ, 615, 921Google Scholar
Matt, S. P., MacGregor, K. B., Pinsonneault, M. H., & Greene, T. P. 2012, ApJL, 754, L26Google Scholar
Mignone, A., Bodo, G., Massaglia, S., et al. 2007, ApJS, 170, 228Google Scholar
Miller, B. P., Gallo, E., Wright, J. T., & Dupree, A. K. 2012, ApJ, 754, 137Google Scholar
Pont, F. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 1789Google Scholar
Russell, C. T. 1993, Reports on Progress in Physics, 56, 687Google Scholar
Strugarek, A., Brun, A. S., Matt, S. P., & Reville, V., in preparationGoogle Scholar
Strugarek, A., Brun, A. S., & Matt, S. 2012, in SF2A-2012: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics. Eds.: S. Boissier, 419–423Google Scholar
Ustyugova, G. V., Koldoba, A. V., Romanova, M. M., Chechetkin, V. M., & Lovelace, R. V. E. 1999, ApJ, 516, 221Google Scholar
Vidotto, A. A., Opher, M., Jatenco-Pereira, V., & Gombosi, T. I. 2010, ApJ, 720, 1262Google Scholar
Washimi, H. & Shibata, S. 1993, MNRAS, 262, 936Google Scholar
Weber, E. J. & Davis, L. J. 1967, ApJS, 148, 217Google Scholar
Zanni, C. & Ferreira, J. 2009, A&A, 508, 1117Google Scholar
Zarka, P. 2007, Planetary and Space Science, 55, 598Google Scholar