Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T20:56:22.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metallicity and Planet Formation – Observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

Jeff A. Valenti*
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore MD 21211, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Early abundance measurements established that stars known to host giant planets are metal rich compared to the Sun. More extensive abundance measurements then showed that giant planet hosts are metal rich compared to the parent sample in planet searches. Stars spanning a range of convection zone depths all show the same metallicity effect, ruling out significant abundance enhancements due to selective accretion. Most known planets migrated inwards from the snow line, but subsamples closer to and further from the star have similar iron abundances, so the stopping point of migration does not depend on metallicity. Stars recently discovered to host Neptune mass planets may be metal poor compared to the Sun, particularly if one focusses on stars that do not also host higher mass planets. This would be consistent with core-accretion models of planet formation. Before drawing physical conclusions, it will be necessary to check for metallicity bias in the subsample of stars around which Neptune mass planets could have been found. M dwarf abundances are currently too uncertain to relate planet frequency and host star metallicity, due mainly to missing or incorrect molecular line data.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Allende Prieto, C., Barklem, P. S., Lambert, D. L., & Cunha, K. 2004, A&A, 420, 183Google Scholar
Fischer, D. A. & Valenti, J. A. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1102Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, K. 1998, A&A, 338, 161Google Scholar
Gonzalez, G. 1997, MNRAS, 285, 403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ida, S. & Lin, D. N. C. 2004, ApJ, 616, 567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. & Apps, K. 2009, ApJ, 699, 933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livio, M & Pringle, J. E. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 42LCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayor, M 2009, IAU General Assembly XXVII, Special Session 6, invited talkGoogle Scholar
Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., & Mayor, M. 2004, A&A, 415, 1153Google Scholar
Valenti, J. A. & Fischer, D. A. 2005, ApJS, 159, 141Google Scholar
Valenti, J. A. & Piskunov, N. 1996, A&A, 118, 595Google Scholar