Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:38:17.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Massive Star Astrophysics with the new Magellanic Cloud photometric survey MCSF

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Dominik J. Bomans ,
Alexander Becker  and
Kerstin Weis
Dominik J. Bomans
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute of the Ruhr-University Bochum email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] RUB Research Department “Plasmas with complex interactions”
Alexander Becker
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute of the Ruhr-University Bochum email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Kerstin Weis
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute of the Ruhr-University Bochum email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Surveys of the resolved stellar content of entire galaxies are the natural tool to study fast evolutionary phases of massive stars. Therefore we launched the Magellanic Clouds Massive Stars and Feedback Survey (MCSF) and periodically imaged for 3 years the entire Small and Large Magellanic Cloud in u, B, V, R, I and Hα, [Oiii], [Sii] using the twin telescope RoBoTT at the University Observatory of the Ruhr-University Bochum at Cerro Armazones, Chile. Observations with short exposure times are included to ensure brightest stars not to be saturated, yielding a full coverage in luminosity. With this unique dataset we can study the massive stellar populations up to MB ∼ −10 mag and their feedback. Upon completion a high quality photometric and spatially complete catalog of the Magellanic Clouds will be established which is be comparable (or even beyond) the quality of HST based photometry of nearby galaxies.

Keywords

(stars:) supergiantsstars: Wolf-Rayet(stars:) Hertzsprung-Russell diagramstars: emission-lineISM: bubblessurveys(galaxies:) Magellanic Cloudsgalaxies: stellar contentmethods: statistical
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Issue S307: New windows on massive stars: asteroseismology, interferometry, and spectropolarimetry , June 2014 , pp. 414 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Alonso-Garcia, J., Mateo, M., Sen, B., et al. 2012, AJ 143, 70Google Scholar
Beaulieu, J.-P., de Wit, W. J., Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., et al. 2001, A&A 380, 168Google Scholar
Bomans, D. J. 2013, in Pugliese, G., de Koter, A., & Wijburg, M. (eds.), 370 Years of Astronomy in Utrecht, Vol. 470 of ASP Conference Series, p. 245Google Scholar
Erben, T., Schirmer, M., Dietrich, J. P., et al. 2005, Astron. Nachr. 326, 432Google Scholar
Georgy, C., Ekström, S., Eggenberger, P., et al. 2013, A&A 558, A103Google Scholar
Gordon, K. D., Meixner, M., Meade, M. R., et al. 2011, AJ 142, 102Google Scholar
Hagen, L., Siegel, M., Gronwall, C., Hoversten, E. A., & Immler, S. 2014, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #223, Vol. 223, p. 442.30Google Scholar
Hainich, R., Rühling, U., Todt, H., et al. 2014, A&A 565, A27Google Scholar
Hess, R. 1924, in Probleme der Astronomie. Festschrift fur Hugo v. Seeliger, p. 265, Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, R. M. & Davidson, K. 1979, ApJ 232, 409Google Scholar
Iqbal, S. & Keller, S. C. 2013, MNRAS 435, 3103Google Scholar
Keller, S. C., Bessell, M. S., Cook, K. H., Geha, M., & Syphers, D. 2002, AJ 124, 2039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, S. C., Wood, P. R., & Bessell, M. S. 1999, A&AS 134, 489Google Scholar
Lejeune, T. & Schaerer, D. 2001, A&A 366, 538Google Scholar
Levesque, E. M., Massey, P., Olsen, K. A. G., et al. 2006, ApJ 645, 1102Google Scholar
Maeder, A. & Meynet, G. 2001, A&A 373, 555Google Scholar
Martayan, C., Baade, D., & Fabregat, J. 2010, A&A 509, A11Google Scholar
Massey, P. 2002, ApJS 141, 81Google Scholar
Massey, P., Neugent, K. F., Morrell, N., & Hillier, D. J. 2014, ApJ 788, 83Google Scholar
Meixner, M., Gordon, K. D., Indebetouw, R., et al. 2006, AJ 132, 2268Google Scholar
Sabogal, B. E., Mennickent, R. E., Pietrzyński, G., & Gieren, W. 2005, MNRAS 361, 1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, R., Thilker, D., Bianchi, L., & Wyder, T. 2014, Advances in Space Research 53, 939Google Scholar
Skiff, B. A. 2013, VizieR Online Data Catalog 1, 2023Google Scholar
Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ 131, 1163Google Scholar
Smith, C., Leiton, R., & Pizarro, S. 2000, in Alloin, D., Olsen, K., & Galaz, G. (eds.), Stars, Gas and Dust in Galaxies: Exploring the Links, Vol. 221 of ASP Conference Series, p. 83Google Scholar
Sturm, R., Haberl, F., Pietsch, W., et al. 2013, A&A 558, A3Google Scholar
Udalski, A., Soszynski, I., Szymanski, M. K., et al. 2008a, AcA 58, 89Google Scholar
Udalski, A., Soszyński, I., Szymański, M. K., et al. 2008b, AcA 58, 329Google Scholar
Zaritsky, D. & Harris, J. 2004, ApJ 604, 167Google Scholar
Zaritsky, D., Harris, J., Thompson, I. B., Grebel, E. K., & Massey, P. 2002, AJ 123, 855Google Scholar