Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T12:22:43.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetically assisted explosions of weakly magnetized stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2017

Hidetomo Sawai  and
Shoichi Yamada
Hidetomo Sawai
Affiliation:
Research Organization for Information Science & Technology, Minatojima-Minamimachi 1-5-2, Chuo, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan email: [email protected] Scinence & Engineering, Waseda University, Okubo 3-4-1, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
Shoichi Yamada
Affiliation:
Scinence & Engineering, Waseda University, Okubo 3-4-1, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We carried out high resolution simulations of weakly-magnetized core-collapse supernovae in two-dimensional axisymmetry in order to see the influence of the magnetic field and rotation on the explosion. We found that the magnetic field amplified by magnetorotational instability (MRI) has a great positive impact on the explosion by enhancing the neutrino heating, provided that the progenitor has large angular momentum close to the highest value found in stellar evolution calculations. We also found that even for progenitors neither involving strong magnetic flux nor large angular momentum, the magnetic field is greatly amplified by the convection aand rotation, and this leads to the boost of the explosion again by enhancing the neutrino heating.

Keywords

supernovae: generalMHDinstabilitiesmethods: numerical
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 12 , Symposium S331: Supernova 1987A:30 years later - Cosmic Rays and Nuclei from Supernovae and their aftermaths , February 2017 , pp. 125 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2017 

References

Akiyama, S., Wheeler, J. C., Meier, D. L., & Lichtenstadt, I. 2003, Astrophys J., 584, 954 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balbus, S. A. & Hawley, J. F. 1991, Astrophys J., 376, 214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janka, H.-T. 2001, Phys. Rep., 368, 527 Google Scholar
Liebendörfer, M. 2005, Astrophys J., 633, 1042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez-Agudelo, O. H., Simón-Díaz, S., Sana, H., et al. 2013, Phys. Rep., 560, A29 Google Scholar
Sawai, H. & Yamada, S. 2014, Astrophys J. Lett., 784, L10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawai, H. & Yamada, S. 2016, Astrophys J., 817, 153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawai, H., Yamada, S., Kotake, K., & Suzuki, H. 2013, Astrophys J., 764, 10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, H., Toki, H., Oyamatsu, K., & Sumiyoshi, K. 1998a, Nuclear Physics A, 637, 435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, H., Toki, H., Oyamatsu, K., & Sumiyoshi, K. 1998b, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 100, 1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woosley, S. E. & Heger, A. 2006, Astrophys J., 637, 914 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woosley, S. E. & Weaver, T. A. 1995, Astrophys J. Sup., 101, 181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamada, S. & Sawai, H. 2004, Astrophys J., 608, 907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar