Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:54:57.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic helicity transported by flux emergence and shuffling motions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2013

Y. Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories of Chinese Academy of Sciences email: [email protected] Kwasan and Hida Observatories, Kyoto University, Yamashina-ku, Kyoto 607-8471 email: [email protected]@kwasan.kyoto-u.ac.jp
R. Kitai
Affiliation:
Kwasan and Hida Observatories, Kyoto University, Yamashina-ku, Kyoto 607-8471 email: [email protected]@kwasan.kyoto-u.ac.jp
K. Takizawa
Affiliation:
Kwasan and Hida Observatories, Kyoto University, Yamashina-ku, Kyoto 607-8471 email: [email protected]@kwasan.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Magnetic helicity can be transported from sub-photosphere into corona by the emergence of helical magnetic field lines and the shuffling motions of foot-points of pre-existing coronal field lines. Active region NOAA 10930 was observed by SP and NFI of SOT on board Hinode when it pass through the solar meridian. Based on these observations, we calculate magnetic helicity flow of both terms, by regarding Doppler velocity as normal velocity. The results are compared with which calculated by method proposed by Zhang et. al. (2012). Our results show that helicity injection maps calculated by both methods have similar distribution and the integration values have the same magnitude.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Berger, M. A. & Field, G. B. 1984, J. Fluid Mech, 147, 133 Google Scholar
Berger, M. A. 1999, in Magnetic Helicity in Space and Laboratory Plasmas, ed. Brown, M. R., Canfield, R. C., & Pevtsov, A. A. (Geophys. Monogr. 111; Demoulin, P., Mandrini, C. H., van DrielGesztelyi, L., Thompson, B. J., Washington: AGU), 1 Google Scholar
Démoulin, P. & Berger, M. A. 2003, Solar Phys., 215, 203 Google Scholar
Fan, Y. H. & Gibson, S. E. 2004, ApJ, 609, 1123 Google Scholar
Ichimoto, K., et al. 2008, Solar Phys., 249, 233 Google Scholar
Kosugi, T., et al. 2007, Solar Phys., 243, 3 Google Scholar
Leka, K. D., Canfield, R. C., & McClymont, A. N. 1996, ApJ, 462, 547 Google Scholar
Suematsu, Y., et al. 2008, Solar Phys., 249, 197 Google Scholar
Tsuneta, S., et al. 2008, Solar Phys., 249, 167 Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Kitai, R., & Takizawa, K. 2012, ApJ, 751, 85 Google Scholar