Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T21:47:18.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic geometry and activity of cool stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2020

Sudeshna Boro Saikia
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Department of Astrophysics, Tuerkenschanzstrasse 17, 1180, Vienna, Austria email: [email protected]
Theresa Lüftinger
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Department of Astrophysics, Tuerkenschanzstrasse 17, 1180, Vienna, Austria email: [email protected]
Manuel Guedel
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Department of Astrophysics, Tuerkenschanzstrasse 17, 1180, Vienna, Austria email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Stellar magnetic field manifestations such as stellar winds and EUV radiation are the key drivers of planetary atmospheric loss and escape. To understand how the central star influences habitability, it is very important to perform detailed investigation of the star’s magnetic field. We investigate the surface magnetic field geometry and chromospheric activity of 51 sun-like stars. The magnetic geometry is reconstructed using Zeeman Doppler imaging. Chromospheric activity is measured using the Ca II H& K lines. We confirm that the Sun’s large-scale geometry is dominantly poloidal, which is also true for slowly rotating stars. Contrary to the Sun, rapidly rotating stars can have a strong toroidal field and a weak poloidal field. This separation in field geometry appears at Ro=1. Our results show that detailed investigation of stellar magnetic field is important to understand its influence on planetary habitability.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020 

References

Alvarado-Gómez, J. D., Hussain, G. A. J., Grunhut, J., et al. 2015, A&A, 582, A38 Google Scholar
Boro Saikia, S., Marvin, C. J., Jeffers, S. V., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A108 Google Scholar
Hackman, T., Lehtinen, J., Rosén, L., Kochukhov, O., & Käpylä, M. J. 2016, A&A, 587, A28 Google Scholar
Marsden, S. C., Petit, P., Jeffers, S. V., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3517 10.1093/mnras/stu1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyes, R. W., Hartmann, L. W., Baliunas, S. L., Duncan, D. K., & Vaughan, A. H. 1984, ApJ, 279, 763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosén, L., Kochukhov, O., Hackman, T., & Lehtinen, J. 2016, A&A, 593, A35 Google Scholar
Wright, N. J., Drake, J. J., Mamajek, E. E., & Henry, G. W. 2011, ApJ, 743, 48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar