Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:42:27.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetic Fields in Molecular Clouds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2011

Paolo Padoan ,
Tuomas Lunttila ,
Mika Juvela ,
Åke Nordlund ,
David Collins ,
Alexei Kritsuk ,
Michael Normal  and
Sergey Ustyugov
Paolo Padoan
Affiliation:
ICREA & ICC, University of Barcelona, Marti i Franquès 1, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain email: [email protected]
Tuomas Lunttila
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Mika Juvela
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Åke Nordlund
Affiliation:
Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
David Collins
Affiliation:
CASS / Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego, USA
Alexei Kritsuk
Affiliation:
CASS / Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego, USA
Michael Normal
Affiliation:
CASS / Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego, USA
Sergey Ustyugov
Affiliation:
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Supersonic magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence in molecular clouds (MCs) plays an important role in the process of star formation. The effect of the turbulence on the cloud fragmentation process depends on the magnetic field strength. In this work we discuss the idea that the turbulence is super-Alfvénic, at least with respect to the cloud mean magnetic field. We argue that MCs are likely to be born super-Alfvénic. We then support this scenario based on a recent simulation of the large-scale warm interstellar medium turbulence. Using small-scale isothermal MHD turbulence simulation, we also show that MCs may remain super-Alfvénic even with respect to their rms magnetic field strength, amplified by the turbulence. Finally, we briefly discuss the comparison with the observations, suggesting that super-Alfvénic turbulence successfully reproduces the Zeeman measurements of the magnetic field strength in dense MC clouds.

Keywords

ISM: kinematics and dynamicsMHDstars: formationturbulence
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 6 , Symposium S271: Astrophysical Dynamics: From Stars to Galaxies , June 2010 , pp. 187 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Krumholz, M. R. & Tan, J. C., ApJ 654, 304–315 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, R. B., MNRAS 194, 809–826 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyer, M. H. & Brunt, C. M., ApJL 615, L45–L48 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padoan, P., Juvela, M., Kritsuk, A. & Norman, M. L., ApJL 653, L125–L128 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritsuk, A. G., Norman, M. L., Padoan, P. & Wagner, R., ApJ 665, 416–431 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritsuk, A. G., Ustyugov, S. D., Norman, M. L. & Padoan, P., Journal of Physics Conference Series 180, 012020 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosolowsky, E. W., Pineda, J. E., Kauffmann, J. & Goodman, A. A., ApJ 679, 1338–1351 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krumholz, M. R. & McKee, C. F., ApJ 630, 250–268 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padoan, P. & Nordlund, A., ArXiv e-prints (2009), arXiv:astro-ph/0907.0248.Google Scholar
Padoan, P. & Nordlund, Å., ApJ 576, 870–879 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padoan, P., Nordlund, Å., Kritsuk, A. G., Norman, M. L. & Li, P. S., ApJ 661, 972–981 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, F. H., Adams, F. C. & Lizano, S., ARA&A 25, 23 (1987).Google Scholar
Padoan, P. & Nordlund, Å., ArXiv e-prints (1997) arXiv:astro-ph/9706176.Google Scholar
Padoan, P. & Nordlund, Å., ApJ 526, 279 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padoan, P., Jimenez, R., Juvela, M. & Nordlund, Å., ApJL 604, L49–L52 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunttila, T., Padoan, P., Juvela, M. & Nordlund, Å., ApJL 686, L91–L94 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunttila, T., Padoan, P., Juvela, M. & Nordlund, Å., ApJL 702, L37–L41 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ustyugov, S. D., Popov, M. V., Kritsuk, A. G. & Norman, M. L., Journal of Computational Physics 228, 7614–7633 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritsuk, A. G., Ustyugov, S. D., Norman, M. L. & Padoan, P., ASPC, 406, 15 (2009)Google Scholar
Haugen, N. E. L., Brandenburg, A., & Mee, A. J., MNRAS 353, 947–952 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troland, T. H. & Crutcher, R. M., ApJ 680, 457–465 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falgarone, E., Puget, J. L. & Pérault, M., A&A 257, 715 (1992).Google Scholar
Crutcher, R. M., ApJ 234, 881–890 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. P., De, E. J. Geus & Blitz, L., ApJ 428, 693 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutcher, R. M., Hakobian, N. & Troland, T. H., ApJ 692, 844–855 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar