Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:22:24.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetic field configuration in a flaring active region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2015

J. Palacios ,
L. A. Balmaceda  and
L. E. Vieira
J. Palacios
Affiliation:
Space Reseach Group–Space Weather, Departamento de Física y Matemáticas, Universidad de Alcalá, University Campus, Sciences Building, P.O. 28871, Alcalá de Henares, Spain email: [email protected]
L. A. Balmaceda
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), Avda. dos Astronautas, São José dos Campos–SP, 12227-010, Brazil Instituto de Ciencias Astronómicas, de la Tierra y el Espacio, ICATE-CONICET Avda. de España Sur 1512, J5402DSP, San Juan, Argentina
L. E. Vieira
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), Avda. dos Astronautas, São José dos Campos–SP, 12227-010, Brazil
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) provides continuous monitoring of the Sun's vector magnetic field through full-disk photospheric data with both high cadence and high spatial resolution. Here we investigate the evolution of AR 11249 from March 6 to March 7, 2012. We make use of HMI Stokes imaging, SDO/SHARPs, the HMI magnetic field line-of-sight (LOS) maps and the transverse components of the magnetic field as well as LOS velocity maps in order to detect regions with significant flux emergence and/or cancellation. In addition, we apply the Local Correlation Tracking (LCT) technique to the total and signed magnetic flux data and derive maps of horizontal velocity. From this analysis, we were able to pinpoint localized shear regions (and a shear channel) where penumbrae and pore formation areas, with strong linear polarization signals, are stretched and squeezed, showing also important downflows and upflows. We have also utilized Hinode/SP data and compared them to the HMI-SHARPs and the HMI-Stokes spectrograms. The aforementioned shear channel seems to correspond well with the X-class flare main channel of March 7 2012, as observed in AIA/SDO 171, 304 and 1600 Å.

Keywords

Sun: photospheremagnetic fieldsflarestechniques: polarimetric
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 10 , Symposium S305: Polarimetry: From the Sun to Stars and Stellar Environments , December 2014 , pp. 97 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Benz, A. O., 2008, Living Rev. Solar Phys. 5, 1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobra, M. G., Sun, X., Hoeksema, J. T., Turmon, M., Liu, Y., Hayashi, K., Barnes, G., & Leka, K. D., 2014, Solar Phys. 289, 3549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrero, J. M., Tomczyk, S., Kubo, M., Socas-Navarro, H., Schou, J., Couvidat, S., & Bogart, R., 2011, Solar Phys. 273, 267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centeno, R., Schou, J., Hayashi, K., Norton, A., Hoeksema, J. T., Liu, Y., Leka, K. D., & Barnes, G., 2014, Solar Phys. 289, 3531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, S. M., Pizzo, V. J., Balch, C. C., Biesecker, D. A., Bornmann, P., Hildner, E., Lewis, L. D., Grubb, R. N., Husler, M. P., Prendergast, K. and 26 coauthors, 2005, Solar Phys. 226, 255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, J. T., Liu, Y., Hayashi, K., Sun, X., Schou, , Couvidat, S., Norton, A., Bobra, M., Centeno, R., Leka, K. D., and 2 coauthors, 2014, Solar Phys. 289, 3483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichimoto, K., Lites, B., Elmore, D., Suematsu, Y., Tsuneta, S., Katsukawa, Y., Shimizu, T., Shine, R., Tarbell, T., Title, A. and 10 coauthors, 2008, Solar Phys. 249, 233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosugi, T., Matsuzaki, K., Sakao, T., Shimizu, T., Sone, Y., Tachikawa, S., Hashimoto, T., Minesugi, K., Ohnishi, A., Yamada, T. and 15 coauthors, 2007, Solar Phys. 243, 3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landi Degl'Innocenti, L., & Landolfi, M., 2004, ASSL vol. 307, Kluwer Academic Publishers Google Scholar
Lemen, J. R., Title, A. M., Akin, D. J., Boerner, P. F., Chou, C., Drake, J. F., Duncan, D. W., Edwards, C. G., Friedlaender, F. M., Heyman, G. F. and 37 coauthors 2012, Solar Phys. 275, 17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
November, L. J., & Simon, G. W., 1988, ApJ 333, 427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesnell, W. D., Thompson, B. J., & Chamberlin, P. C., 2012, Solar Phys. 275, 3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherrer, P. H., Schou, J., Bush, R. I., Kosovichev, A. G., Bogart, R. S., Hoeksema, J. T., Liu, Y., Duvall, T. L., Zhao, J., Title, A. M. and 3 coauthors, 2012, Solar Phys. 275, 207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuneta, S., Ichimoto, K., Katsukawa, Y., Nagata, S., Otsubo, M., Shimizu, T., Suematsu, Y., Nakagiri, M., Noguchi, M., Tarbell, T. and 15 coauthors, 2008, Solar Phys. 249, 167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, Z. & Molowny-Horas, R., 1995, A&A 295, 199 Google Scholar