Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:36:06.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lower and middle atmosphere and ozone layer responses to solar variation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

Ana G. Elias*
Affiliation:
CONICET, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas, Argentina Lab. Fisica de la Atmosfera, Depto. de Fisica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnologia, Universidad Nacional de Tucuman, Av. Independencia 1800, 4000 Tucuman, Argentina email: [email protected] / [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Global warming in the troposphere and the decrease of stratospheric ozone concentration has become a major concern to the scientific community. The increase in greenhouse gases and aerosols concentration is believed to be the main cause of this global change in the lower atmosphere and in stratospheric ozone, which is corresponded by a cooling in the middle and upper atmosphere. However, there are natural sources, such as the sun and volcanic eruptions, with the same ability to produce global changes in the atmosphere. The present work will focus on solar variation and its signature in lower and middle atmosphere parameters. The Sun can influence the Earth and its climate through electromagnetic radiation variations and also through changes in the solar wind which causes geomagnetic storms. The effects of both mechanisms over the lower and middle atmosphere and ozone layer will be discussed through an overview of selected papers, which by no means cover this subject that is extremely wide and complex. A fundamental understanding of the atmosphere response to solar variations is required for understanding and interpreting the causes of atmospheric variability. This is an essential focus of climate science, which is seeking to determine the extent to which human activities are altering the planetary energy balance through the emission of greenhouse gases and pollutants.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Balachandran, N. K. & Rind, D. 1995, Modeling the effects of UV variability and the QBO on the troposphere-stratosphere system. Part I:The middle atmosphere, Journal of Climate, 8, 20582079.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beig, G., Scheer, J., Mlynczak, M. G., & Keckhut, P. 2008, Overview of the temperature response in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere to solar activity, Reviews of Geophysics, 46, RG3002, doi:10.1029/2007RG000236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boberg, F. & Lundstedt, H., 2002, Solar Wind Variations Related to Fluctuations of the North Atlantic Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Let., 29, doi10.1029/2002GL014903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasseur, G. 1993, The response of the middle atmosphere to long-term and short-term solar variability: A two dimensional model, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 23, 079–23, 090, doi:10.1029/93JD02406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucha, V. 2002, Long-term trends in geomagnetic and climatic variability, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 27, 427431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, C. J. 1994, Maximum and minimum temperatures at Armagh obsservatory, 1844-1992, and the length of the sunspot cycle, Solar Physics, 152, 3542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carslaw, K. 2009, Cosmic rays, clouds and climate, Nature, 460, 332-333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fadnavis, S. & Beig, G. 2006, Decadal solar effects on temperature and ozone in the tropical stratosphere, Ann. Geophys., 24, 20912103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friis-Christensen, E. & Lassen, K. 1991, Length of the Solar Cycle: An indicator of Solar Activity Closely Associated with Climate, Science, 254, 698700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hood, L. L. 1997, The solar cycle variation of total ozone: Dynamical forcing in the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 13551370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, P. D., Parker, D. E., Osborn, T. J., & Briffa, K. R. 2009, Global and hemispheric temperature anomalies-land and marine instrumental records. In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A.doi: 10.3334/CDIAC/cli.002.Google Scholar
Kodera, K. 2006, The role of dynamics in solar forcing, Space Science Reviews, 125, 319330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keckhut, P., Cagnazzo, C., Chanin, M. L., Claud, C., & Hauchecorne, A., 2005, The 11-year solar-cycle in the temperature in the upper-stratosphere and mesosphere: Part I: Assessment of observations, J. Atm. Terr. Sol. Phys., 67, 940947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, J. 2007, Cosmic Rays and Climate, Surv. Geophys., 28, 333375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labitzke, K. 1987, Sunspots, the QBO, and the stratospheric temperature in the north polar region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 14, 535537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labitzke, K. & van Loon, K. 1997, Total ozone and the 11-yr sunspot cycle, Journal of Ammpherrc and Solar-Terreslrial Physics, 59, 919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labitzke, K. 2004, On the Signal of the 11-Year Sunspot Cycle in the Stratosphere and its Modulation by the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO), J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 66, 11511157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labitzke, K. & van Loon, H. 1988, Association between the 11-year solar cycle, the QBO and the atmosphere. Part I: The troposphere and stratosphere in the northern hemisphere in winter, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 50, 197206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labitzke, K. 2005, On the Solar Cycle-QBO-Relationship: A Summary, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 67, 4554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labitzke, K. & Kunze, M. 2009, Variability in the stratosphere: The sun and the QBO, In: Climate and Weather of the Sun-Earth System (CAWSES): Selected Papers from the 2007 Kyoto Symposium, Edited by Tsuda, T., Fujii, R., Shibata, K., and Geller, M. A., pp. 257278, Terrapub, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Lastovicka, J. & Mlch, P. 1999, Is ozone affected by geomagnetic storms?, Advances in Space Research, 24, 631640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lastovicka, J. & Krizan, P. 2005, Geomagnetic storms, Forbush decreases of cosmic rays and total ozone at northern higher middle latitudes, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 67, 119124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Treut, H., Somerville, R., Cubasch, U., Ding, Y., Mauritzen, C., Mokssit, A., Peterson T., & Prather, M. 2007, Historical Overview of Climate Change. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Marsh, N. & Svensmark, H., 2003, Solar influence on Earth's climate, Space Science Reviews 107, 317325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthes, K., Langematz, U., Gray, L. L., Kodera, K., & Labitzke, K. 2004, Improved 11-year solar signal in the Freie Universitat Berlin Climate Middle Atmosphere Model (FUBCMAM), J. Geophys. Res., 109, D06101, doi:10.1029/2003JD004012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palamara, D. R. & Bryant, E. A. 2004, Geomagnetic activity forcing of the Northern Annular Mode via the stratosphere, Annales Geophysicae, 22, 725731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soukharev, B. E. & Hood, L. L. 2006, Solar cycle variation of stratospheric ozone: Multiple regression analysis of long-term satellite data sets and comparisons with models, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D20314, doi:10.1029/2006JD007107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensmark, H. 2000. Cosmic rays and Earth's climate, Space Science Reviews 93, 175185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensmark, H. & Friis-Christensen, E., 1997, Variation of cosmic ray flux and global cloud coverage-a missing link in solar-climate relationships, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 59, 12251232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thejll, P., Christiansen, B., & Gleisner, H. 2003, On correlations between the North Atlantic Oscillation, geopotential heights, and geomagnetic activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1347, doi:10.1029/2002GL016598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar