Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:14:32.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lithium abundance as a boundary condition for age and mass determination of solar twin stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

M. Castro
Affiliation:
DFTE - UFRN, Natal, Brazil
J.-D. do Nascimento Jr.
Affiliation:
DFTE - UFRN, Natal, Brazil
J. S. da Costa
Affiliation:
DFTE - UFRN, Natal, Brazil
J. Meléndez
Affiliation:
Centro de Astrofísica da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
M. Bazot
Affiliation:
Centro de Astrofísica da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
S. Théado
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Toulouse-Tarbes - UPS, Toulouse, France
G. F. Porto de Mello
Affiliation:
Observatório do Valongo - UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
J. R. De Medeiros
Affiliation:
DFTE - UFRN, Natal, Brazil
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We explore the non-standard mixing history of five solar twins to determine as precisely as possible their mass and age. For this, we computed a grid of evolutionary models with non-standard mixing at given metallicities with the Toulouse-Geneva code for a range of stellar masses. We choose the evolutionary model that best fit the low lithium abundances observed in the solar twins. Our best model for each solar twin provides a mass and age solution constrained by their Li content and Teff determination. Li depletion due to the additional mixing in solar-twins is strongly mass dependent. An accurate lithium abundance measurement connected with non-standard models provides a more precise information about the age and mass better than that determined only by classical methods.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Basu, S., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., et al. 1997, MNRAS, 292, 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
do Nascimento, J.-D. Jr., Castro, M., et al. 2009, A&A, 501, 687Google Scholar
Hui-Bon-Hoa, A. 2008, Ap&SS, 316, 55Google Scholar
Meléndez, J. & Ramírez, I. 2007, ApJ, 669, L89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, O., Vauclair, S., Charbonnel, C., & Dziembowski, W. A. 1996, A&A 312, 1000Google Scholar
Richard, O., Thado, S., & Vauclair, S. 2004, SoPh, 220, 243Google Scholar
Takeda, Y., Kawanomoto, S., Honda, S., Ando, H., & Sakurai, T. 2007, A&A, 468, 663Google Scholar
Théado, S. & Vauclair, S. 2003, ApJ 587, 784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vanLeeuwen, F. Leeuwen, F. 2007, ASSL, 350Google Scholar