Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:33:07.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Large scale direct galaxy collision simulations with central supermassive binary black holes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2016

Margaryta Sobolenko ,
Peter Berczik  and
Rainer Spurzem
Margaryta Sobolenko
Affiliation:
Main Astronomical Observatory, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 27 Akademika Zabolotnoho St., 03680, Kyiv, Ukraine email: [email protected]
Peter Berczik
Affiliation:
Main Astronomical Observatory, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 27 Akademika Zabolotnoho St., 03680, Kyiv, Ukraine email: [email protected] National Astronomical Observatories of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20A Datun Rd., Chaoyang District, 100012, Beijing, China Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum für Astronomie, University of Heidelberg, Mönchhofstrasse 12-14, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
Rainer Spurzem
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20A Datun Rd., Chaoyang District, 100012, Beijing, China Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum für Astronomie, University of Heidelberg, Mönchhofstrasse 12-14, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a set of, large scale direct N-body simulations of the galaxy collision with the central Supermassive Black Hole Binary (SMBHB) system. Based on our simulations which include the accurate Post Newtonian (PN) relativistic dynamical corrections we can estimated the merging time for the real astrophysical object. Each galaxy initially was represented as a set of particles (up to N=500k) with Plummer distribution. The SMBHBs system is described using the two special high mass, i.e. “relativistic”, particles. The interaction between these two particles have an extra PN correction terms (up to 3.5PN). Merging time upper limit was obtained for the closely interacting galaxy system NGC 6240.

Keywords

black hole physicsmethods: N-body simulationsgalaxies: nucleiindividual (NGC6240)
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 10 , Issue S312: Star Clusters and Black Holes in Galaxies across Cosmic Time , August 2014 , pp. 105 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Begelman, M. C., Blandford, R. D., & Rees, M. J. 1980, Nature, 287, 307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berczik, P., Spurzem, R., Wang, L., Zhong, S., & Huang, S. 2013, in Third International Conference “High Performance Computing”, HPC-UA 2013, p. 52–59, 52–59Google Scholar
Berczik, P., Nitadori, K., Zhong, S., et al. 2011, in International conference on High Performance Computing, Kyiv, Ukraine, October 8-10, 2011., p. 8-18, 8–18Google Scholar
Collin, S. 2006, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 861, Albert Einstein Century International Conference, ed. Alimi, J.-M. & Füzfa, A., 587–595Google Scholar
Engel, H., Davies, R. I., Genzel, R., et al. 2010, A&A, 524, A56Google Scholar
Ferrarese, L., & Ford, H. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 116, 523Google Scholar
Gillessen, S., Eisenhauer, F., Trippe, S., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J., 692, 1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, M., Debattista, V. P., Cole, D. R., et al. 2014, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 441, 1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, F. M., Preto, M., Berczik, P., et al. 2012, Astrophys. J., 749, 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komossa, S., Burwitz, V., Hasinger, G., et al. 2003, Astrophys. J., Lett., 582, L15Google Scholar
Longair, M. S. 1996, Our evolving universe (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D. 1969, Nature, 223, 690Google Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D., & Rees, M. J. 1971, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 152, 461Google Scholar
Medling, A. M., Ammons, S. M., Max, C. E., et al. 2011, Astrophys. J., 743, 32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakai, N., Sato, N., & Yamauchi, A. 2002, Publ. Aston. Soc. Jpn., 54, L27Google Scholar
Nitadori, K., & Makino, J. 2008, N. Astr., 13, 498Google Scholar
Solomon, P. M., Downes, D., Radford, S. J. E., & Barrett, J. W. 1997, Astrophys. J., 478, 144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tecza, M., Genzel, R., Tacconi, L. J., et al. 2000, Astrophys. J., 537, 178Google Scholar
Véron-Cetty, M.-P., & Véron, P. 2010, A&A, 518, A10Google Scholar
Wolfe, A. M., & Burbidge, G. R. 1970, Astrophys. J., 161, 419CrossRefGoogle Scholar