Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:35:50.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kepler Reliability and Occurrence Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2016

Steve Bryson
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Kepler mission has produced tables of exoplanet candidates (“KOI table”), as well as tables of transit detections (“TCE table”), hosted at the Exoplanet Archive (http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu). Transit detections in the TCE table that are plausibly due to a transiting object are selected for inclusion in the KOI table. KOI table entries that have not been identified as false positives (FPs) or false alarms (FAs) are classified as planet candidates (PCs, Mullally et al. 2015). A subset of PCs have been confirmed as planetary transits with greater than 99% probability, but most PCs have <99% probability of being true planets. The fraction of PCs that are true transiting planets is the PC reliability rate. The overall PC population is believed to have a reliability rate >90% (Morton & Johnson 2011).

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Burke, C. J., et al. 2015 ApJ 809, 1 Google Scholar
Morton, T. D. & Johnson, J. A. 2011, ApJ 738, 170 Google Scholar
Mullally, F., et al. 2015, ApJS 21, l 31 Google Scholar