Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:17:43.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Kepler Completeness Study: A Pipeline Throughput Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Jessie L. Christiansen
Affiliation:
SETI Institute/NASA Ames Research Center, Mail Stop 244-30, P.O. Box 1, Moffett Field, CA 94035-0001 email: [email protected]
Bruce D. Clarke
Affiliation:
SETI Institute/NASA Ames Research Center, Mail Stop 244-30, P.O. Box 1, Moffett Field, CA 94035-0001 email: [email protected]
Christopher J. Burke
Affiliation:
SETI Institute/NASA Ames Research Center, Mail Stop 244-30, P.O. Box 1, Moffett Field, CA 94035-0001 email: [email protected]
Jon M. Jenkins
Affiliation:
SETI Institute/NASA Ames Research Center, Mail Stop 244-30, P.O. Box 1, Moffett Field, CA 94035-0001 email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Kepler Mission was designed to measure the frequency of Earth-like planets in the habitable zone of Sun-like stars. A requirement for determining the underlying planet population from a sample of detected planets is understanding the completeness of that sample—what fraction of the planets that could have been discovered in a given data set were actually detected. Here we describe an experiment designed to address a specific aspect of that question, which is the issue of signal throughput efficiency. We investigate the extent to which the Kepler pipeline preserves transit signals by injecting simulated transit signals into the pixel-level data, processing the modified pixels through the pipeline, and measuring their detection statistics. For the single channel that we examine initially, we inject simulated transit signal trains into the pixel time series of each of the 1801 targets for the 89 days that constitute Quarter 3. For the 1680 that behave as expected in the pipeline, on average we find the strength of the injected signal is recovered at 99.6% of the strength of the original signal. Finally we outline the further work required to characterise the completeness of the Kepler pipeline.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Batalha, N. B., et al. 2013, ApJS 204 article id. 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borucki, W. J., et al. 2011b, ApJ, 728, 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borucki, W. J., et al. 2011a, ApJ, 736, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. M., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, S. T., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, J. L., et al. 2012, PASP, 124, 1279Google Scholar
Fischer, D. A., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 2900Google Scholar
Howard, A. W., et al. 2012, ApJS, 201, 15Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. M., et al. 2010, ApJL, 713, L87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, X., Bakos, G. A., & Hartman, J. D. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2001Google Scholar
Mandel, K. & Agol, E. 2002, ApJ, 580, 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofir, A. & Dreizler, S. 2013, A&A 555 article id.A58Google Scholar
Twicken, J. D., Clarke, B. D., Bryson, S. T., Tenenbaum, P., Wu, H., Jenkins, J. M., Girouard, F., & Klaus, T. C. 2010, ProcSPIE, 7740, 774023Google Scholar
Youdin, A. N. 2011, ApJ, 742, 38Google Scholar