Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:05:38.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interferometric Studies of Low-Mass Protostars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2011

Jes K. Jørgensen*
Affiliation:
Niels Bohr Institute & Centre for Star and Planet Formation, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30 DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

With the advances in high angular resolution (sub)millimeter observations of low-mass protostars, windows of opportunities are opening up for very detailed studies of the molecular structure of star forming regions on wide range of spatial scales. Deeply embedded protostars provide an important laboratory to study the chemistry of star formation – providing the link between dense regions in molecular clouds from which stars are formed, i.e., the initial conditions and the end product in terms of, e.g., disk and planet formation. High angular resolution observations at (sub)millimeter wavelengths provide an important tool for studying the chemical composition of such low-mass protostars. They for example constrain the spatial molecular abundance variations – and can thereby identify which species are useful tracers of different components of the protostars at different evolutionary stages. In this review I discuss the possibilities and limitations of using high angular resolution (sub)millimeter interferometric observations for studying the chemical evolution of low-mass protostars – with a particular keen eye toward near-future ALMA observations.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Basu, S. 1998, ApJ, 509, 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisschop, S. E., Jørgensen, J. K., Bourke, T. L., Bottinelli, S., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2008, A&A, 488, 959Google Scholar
Bisschop, S. E., Jørgensen, J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F., & de Wachter, E. B. M. 2007, A&A, 465, 913Google Scholar
Bottinelli, S., Ceccarelli, C., Neri, R., et al. 2004, ApJ, 617, L69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinch, C., Crapsi, A., Jørgensen, J. K., Hogerheijde, M. R., & Hill, T. 2007, A&A, 475, 915Google Scholar
Brinch, C., Jørgensen, J. K., & Hogerheijde, M. R. 2009, A&A, 502, 199Google Scholar
Cazaux, S., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Ceccarelli, C., et al. , 2003, ApJ, 593, L51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceccarelli, C., Loinard, L., Castets, A., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Caux, E. 2000, A&A, 357, L9Google Scholar
Chandler, C. J., Brogan, C. L., Shirley, Y. L., & Loinard, L. 2005, ApJ, 632, 371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, H.-F., Looney, L. W., Tassis, K., Mundy, L. G., & Mouschovias, T. C. 2008, ApJ, 680, 474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, M. L., Corder, S., Duchene, G., et al. , 2011, ArXiv e-printsGoogle Scholar
Enoch, M. L., Corder, S., Dunham, M. M., & Duchêne, G. 2009, ApJ, 707, 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galli, D. & Shu, F. H. 1993a, ApJ, 417, 220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galli, D. & Shu, F. H. 1993b, ApJ, 417, 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennebelle, P. & Ciardi, A. 2009, A&A, 506, L29Google Scholar
Ivezić, Ž., Nenkova, M., & Elitzur, M. 1999, User Manual for DUSTY, University of Kentucky Internal ReportGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, J. K. 2004, A&A, 424, 589Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. K., Bourke, T. L., Myers, P. C., et al. , 2007, ApJ, 659, 479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, J. K., Bourke, T. L., Myers, P. C., et al. , 2005a, ApJ, 632, 973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, J. K., Bourke, T. L., Nguyen Luong, Q., & Takakuwa, S. 2011, å, submittedGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, J. K., Harvey, P. M., Evans, N. J. I., et al. , 2006, ApJ, 645, 1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, J. K., Hogerheijde, M. R., van Dishoeck, E. F., Blake, G. A., & Schöier, F. L. 2004a, A&A, 413, 993Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. K., Schöier, F. L., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2002, A&A, 389, 908Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. K., Schöier, F. L., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2004b, A&A, 416, 603Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. K., Schöier, F. L., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2005b, A&A, 435, 177Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. K., Schöier, F. L., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2005c, A&A, 437, 501Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. K. & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2010, ApJ, 710, L72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F., Visser, R., et al. , 2009, A&A, 507, 861Google Scholar
Kristensen, L. E., Visser, R., van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. , 2010, ArXiv e-printsGoogle Scholar
Kuan, Y., Huang, H., Charnley, S. B., et al. , 2004, ApJ, 616, L27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, F., Parise, B., Kristensen, L., et al. , 2011, A&A, 527, A19Google Scholar
Lommen, D., Jørgensen, J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Crapsi, A. 2008, A&A, 481, 141Google Scholar
Maret, S., Ceccarelli, C., Tielens, A. G. G. M., et al. , 2005, A&A, 442, 527Google Scholar
Matthews, B. C., Hogerheijde, M. R., Jørgensen, J. K., & Bergin, E. A. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maury, A. J., André, P., Hennebelle, P., et al. , 2010, A&A, 512, A40Google Scholar
Parise, B., Caux, E., Castets, A., et al. , 2005, A&A, 431, 547Google Scholar
Persson, M., Jørgensen, J. K., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2011, A&A, submittedGoogle Scholar
Sakai, N., Sakai, T., & Yamamoto, S. 2006, PASJ, 58, L15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schöier, F. L., Jørgensen, J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Blake, G. A. 2002, A&A, 390, 1001Google Scholar
Schöier, F. L., Jørgensen, J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Blake, G. A. 2004, A&A, 418, 185Google Scholar
Shirley, Y. L., Evans, N. J., & Rawlings, J. M. C. 2002, ApJ, 575, 337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, R., Sandell, G., Beck, S. C., et al. , 2004, ApJ, 608, 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terebey, S., Shu, F. H., & Cassen, P. 1984, ApJ, 286, 529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Tak, F. F. S., Black, J. H., Schöier, F. L., Jansen, D. J., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2007, A&A, 468, 627Google Scholar
Watson, D. M., Bohac, C. J., Hull, C., et al. , 2007, Nature, 448, 1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar