Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:41:26.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrated spectral properties of blue concentrated star clusters of the Large Magellanic Cloud

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2006

J. J. Clariá
Affiliation:
Observatorio Astronómico, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
M. C. Parisi
Affiliation:
Observatorio Astronómico, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
A. V. Ahumada
Affiliation:
Observatorio Astronómico, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
J. F. C. Santos Jr.
Affiliation:
Dpto. de Física, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil email: [email protected]
E. Bica
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil email: [email protected]
A. E. Piatti
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio, Bs. As., Argentina email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Integrated spectra of 17 blue Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) clusters were obtained in the (3600-6800 Å) range using the CASLEO (Argentina) 2.15 m telescope. The typical resolution and dispersion were 12 Å and 3.5 Å/pixel, respectively. Cluster ages were derived by means of two methods: the template matching, in which the observed spectra are compared and matched to template spectra with well-known determined properties, and the equivalent width (EW) method, in which diagnostic diagrams involving the sum of EWs of selected spectral lines were employed together with their calibrations with age and metallicity given by Santos & Piatti (2004), hereafter SP. The spectra were normalized to Fλ = 1 at ∼ 5870 Å. The EWs of H Balmer, KCaII, G band and MgI were measured within the spectral windows defined by Bica & Alloin (1986). We then obtained the sum of EWs of the 3 metallic lines (Sm) and of the 3 Balmer lines Hβ, Hγ and Hδ (Sh). As a first approach to get cluster ages, we used the diagnostic diagrams defined by SP. The clusters were then age-ranked according to the SP's calibrations. We used Sm to get a first age estimate using: log t(Gyr) = a0 + a1Sm + a2Sm2, where a0 = −2.18 ± 0.38, a1 = 0.188 ± 0.080 and a2 = −0.0030 ± 0.0032. We then used Sh to get a second age estimate guided by the previous Sm estimate, since from Sh two solutions are possible: log t(Gyr) = { − b ± [b2 − 4a(cSh)]1/2}/2a, where a = −6.35 ± 0.18, b = −8.56 ± 0.35 and c = 23.32 ± 0.20. The average of these two estimates is listed in column 7 of Table 1.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Alcaino, G. & Liller, W. 1987, AJ 94, 372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bica, E. & Alloin, D. 1986, A&A 162, 21Google Scholar
Bica, E., Clariá, J.J., Dottori, H., Santos, J.F.C. Jr. & Piatti, A.E. 1996, ApJS 102, 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bono, G., Marconi, M., Cassisi, S. et al. , 1996, ApJS 102, 57Google Scholar
Burstein, D. & Heiles, C. 1982, AJ 87, 1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piatti, A.E., Bica, E., Geisler, D. & Clariá, J.J. 2003a, MNRAS 344, 965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piatti, A.E., Bica, E., Geisler, D. & Clariá, J.J. 2003b, MNRAS 343, 841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietrzyński, G. & Udalski, A. 2000 AcA 50, 337Google Scholar
Santos, J.F.C. Jr. & Piatti, A.E. 2004, A&A 428, 79 (SP)Google Scholar
Smecker-Hane, T.A., Cole, A.A., Gallagher, J.S. & Stetson, P.B. 2002 ApJ 566, 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vanden Bergh, S. den Bergh, S. 1981, A&AS 46, 79Google Scholar