Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:09:16.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inhomogeneous chemical enrichment in the Galactic Halo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2016

Chiaki Kobayashi*
Affiliation:
Centre for Astrophysics Research, Science and Technology Research Institute, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK; email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a galaxy, chemical enrichment takes place in an inhomogeneous fashion, and the Galactic Halo is one of the places where the inhomogeneous effects are imprinted and can be constrained from observations. I show this using my chemodynamical simulations of Milky Way type galaxies. The scatter in the elemental abundances originate from radial migration, merging/accretion of satellite galaxies, local variation of star formation and chemical enrichment, and intrinsic variation of nucleosynthesis yields. In the simulated galaxies, there is no strong age-metallicity relation. This means that the most metal-poor stars are not always the oldest stars, and can be formed in chemically unevolved clouds at later times. The long-lifetime sources of chemical enrichment such as asymptotic giant branch stars or neutron star mergers can contribute at low metallicities. The intrinsic variation of yields are important in the early Universe or metal-poor systems such as in the Galactic halo. The carbon enhancement of extremely metal-poor (EMP) stars can be best explained by faint supernovae, the low [α/Fe] ratios in some EMP stars naturally arise from low-mass (~ 13 - 15M) supernovae, and finally, the [α/Fe] knee in dwarf spheroidal galaxies can be produced by subclasses of Type Ia supernovae such as SN 2002cx-like objects and sub-Chandrasekhar mass explosions.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Aoki, W., Tominaga, N., Beers, T. C., Honda, S., & Lee, Y. S. 2014, Science, 345, 912Google Scholar
Cresci, G., Mannucci, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2010, Nature, 467, 811Google Scholar
Ishigaki, M. N., Tominaga, N., Kobayashi, C., & Nomoto, K. 2014, ApJ, 792, L32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, C. 2014, in IAU Symposium 298, 298, 167 (K14)Google Scholar
Kobayashi, C., Ishigaki, M. N., Tominaga, N., & Nomoto, K. 2014, ApJ, 5, L5Google Scholar
Kobayashi, C., Karakas, I. A., & Umeda, H. 2011a, MNRAS, 414, 3231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, C., Izutani, N., Karakas, A. I.et al. 2011b, ApJ, 739, L57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, C. & Nakasato, N. 2011, ApJ, 729, 16 (KN11)Google Scholar
Kobayashi, C. & Nomoto, K. 2009, ApJ, 707, 1466Google Scholar
Kobayashi, C., Nomoto, K., & Hachisu, I. 2015, ApJ, 804, L24Google Scholar
Kobayashi, C., Springel, V., & White, S. D. M. 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, C., Tominaga, N., & Nomoto, K. 2011c, ApJ, 730, L14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, C., Umeda, H., Nomoto, K., Tominaga, N., & Ohkubo, T. 2006, ApJ, 653, 1145Google Scholar
Nomoto, K., Kobayashi, C., & Tominaga, N. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 457 (NKT13)Google Scholar
North, P., Cescutti, G., Jablonka, P., et al. 2012, A&A, 541, 45Google Scholar
Pilkington, K., Few, C. G., Gibson, B. K., et al. 2012, A&A, 540, A56Google Scholar
Tolstoy, E., Hill, V., & Tosi, M. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 371Google Scholar
Venn, K. A., Shetrone, M. D., Irwin, M. J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 751, 102Google Scholar