Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:47:49.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Image Retrieval of Earth-like Planets from Light Curves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Hajime Kawahara
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, The University of TokyoTokyo 113-0033, Japan email: [email protected]
Yuka Fujii
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The University of TokyoTokyo 113-0033, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Surface environment of habitable exoplanets will be important for astrobiologists on exoplanets in near future. Diverse surface environments on the Earth including continents, ocean, and meteorological condition (clouds and rains) serve as the backbone of biodiversity. One of the promising approaches to know the landscape of the terrestrial exoplanets is to use scattered light of the planet through direct imaging.

Since spin rotation and orbital revolution change illuminating area on planetary surface and cause time variation to disk-integrated brightness, light curves carry spatial information on the planetary surface. We propose an inversion technique of annual reflected light curves to sketch a two-dimensional albedo map of exoplanets, named the spin-orbit tomography (SOT). Applying the SOT to realistic simulations of the reflected light of an Earth-twin, we demonstrate how the SOT works. The mean cloud and continental distributions can be roughly obtained with single band photometry and difference of two-bands photometry, respectively. The SOT retrieves the planetary image without actually resolving the planet, which can be used to know the habitat of the exoplanets in near future.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Brogi, M., Snellen, I. A. G., de Kok, R. J., Albrecht, S., Birkby, J., & de Mooij, E. J. W. 2012, Nature, 486, 502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, N. B., et al. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 700, 915Google Scholar
Cowan, N. B., et al. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 731, 76Google Scholar
Ford, E. B., Seager, S., & Turner, E. L. 2001, Nature, 412, 885Google Scholar
Fujii, Y. & Kawahara, H. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 755, 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Y., Kawahara, H., Suto, Y., Fukuda, S., Nakajima, T., Livengood, T. A., & Turner, E. L. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 738, 184Google Scholar
Fujii, Y., Kawahara, H., Suto, Y., Taruya, A., Fukuda, S., Nakajima, T., & Turner, E. L. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 715, 866Google Scholar
Kawahara, H., 2012, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 760, L13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, H. & Fujii, Y. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 720, 1333Google Scholar
Kawahara, H. & Fujii, Y. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 739, L62Google Scholar
Kokubo, E. & Ida, S. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 671, 2082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labeyrie, A. 1999, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 194, 350Google Scholar
Oakley, P. H. H. & Cash, W. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 700, 1428Google Scholar
Rodler, F., Lopez-Morales, M., & Ribas, I. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 753, L25Google Scholar