Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:11:20.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identifying Non-transiting Terrestrial Planets with Transit Timing Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2008

Dimitri Veras
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, 211 Bryant Space Science Center, P.O. Box 112055, Gainesville, FL 32611-2055 email: [email protected], [email protected]
Eric B. Ford
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, 211 Bryant Space Science Center, P.O. Box 112055, Gainesville, FL 32611-2055 email: [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Both ground and space-based transit observatories are poised to significantly increase the number of known transiting planets and the number of precisely measured transit times. A planet's transit times represent a clock that can be used to infer the presence of additional planets. Although modeling the transit time variations (TTVs) of a known system is simple, interpreting those variations in terms of the mass and orbital elements of a perturbing planet is much more challenging. Because mutual planetary perturbations are often the dominant source of TTVs, the observable signal can be extremely complex. In these proceedings, we present early results based on a simplistic analysis of the root-mean-square TTV deviation amplitude. We are preparing a more thorough analysis based on a computationally efficient surrogate Bayesian model, which may be combined with analytic approximations and n-body integrations in order to establish the sensitivity of TTV observations to terrestrial-like planets as a function of the system architecture. Besides aiding the interpretation of future transit timing observations, we hope our results can help maximize the productivity of transit timing follow-up campaigns by guiding survey design decisions such as the choice of targets, required precision, and desired number/time span of TTV observations.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2009

References

Agol, E. & Steffen, J. H. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agol, E., Steffen, J., Sari, R., & Clarkson, W. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, L. R. & Deeg, H.-J. 2004, Bioastronomy 2002: Life Among the Stars, 213, 80Google Scholar
Ford, E. B. & Holman, M. J. 2007, Ap. Lett., 664, L51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladman, B. 1993, Icarus, 106, 247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyl, J. S. & Gladman, B. J. 2007, MNRAS, 377, 1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, M. J. & Murray, N. W. 2005, Science, 307, 1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardling, R. A. 2008, Astro-ph arXiv:0805.1928Google Scholar
Miralda-Escudé, J. 2002, ApJ, 564, 1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, C. D. & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar System DynamicsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pál, A. & Kocsis, B. 2008, Astro-ph, arXiv:0806.0629Google Scholar
Simon, A., Szatmáry, K., & Szabó, G. M. 2007, A&A, 470, 727Google Scholar
Steffen, J. H. & Agol, E. 2005, MNRAS, 364, L96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veras, D. & Armitage, P. J. 2004, Icarus, 172, 349CrossRefGoogle Scholar