Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:56:32.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How do red giants respond to mass loss?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2013

Konstantin Pavlovskii
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of Alberta, 11322-89 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E7, Canada email: [email protected]
Natalia Ivanova
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of Alberta, 11322-89 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E7, Canada email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many interacting binaries start their mass exchange when a donor overfilling its Roche lobe has evolved to a giant branch. The response of the donor's radius to the mass loss as compared to the response of its Roche lobe determines the fate of the binary system – whether it will proceed with a stable mass transfer, or experience dramatic common envelope event. Recent studies of responses of realistic giant's stellar models to a fast mass loss showed that this response is not purely adiabatic as previously thought but depends on the behavior of giant's superadiabatic surface layer. In this contribution, we explore in further details how an interplay between superadiabatic layer's thermal timescale and the dynamic timescale of the donor affects the donor's mass loss. We also find that the initiation of the mass loss causes mass loss induced pulsations.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., Herwig, F., Lesaffre, P., & Timmes, F. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudin, F., Barban, C., Belkacem, K., Hekker, S., et al. 2011, A&A, 529, A84Google Scholar
Belkacem, K., Dupret, M. A., Baudin, F., Appourchaux, T., et al. 2012, A&A, 540, L7Google Scholar
Passy, J.-C., Herwig, F., & Paxton, B. 2011, ArXiv, 1111.4202v3Google Scholar
Woods, T. E. & Ivanova, N. 2012, ApJ, 739, L48CrossRefGoogle Scholar