Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:12:11.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hot Jupiter secondary eclipses measured by Kepler

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2011

Brice-Olivier Demory
Affiliation:
Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA. email: [email protected]
Sara Seager
Affiliation:
Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA. email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Hot-Jupiters are known to be dark in visible bandpasses, mainly because of the alkali metal absorption lines and TiO and VO molecular absorption bands. The outstanding quality of the Kepler mission photometry allows a detection (or non-detection upper limits on) giant planet secondary eclipses at visible wavelengths. We present such measurements on published planets from Kepler Q1 data. We then explore how to disentangle between the planetary thermal emission and the reflected light components that can both contribute to the detected signal in the Kepler bandpass. We finally mention how different physical processes can lead to a wide variety of hot-Jupiters albedos.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Jenkins, J. M., Caldwell, D. A., Chandrasekaran, H., & Twicken, J. D., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipping, D. M. & Bakos, G. A. 2011, ApJ, 730, id.50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, J. F., Matthews, J. M., Seager, S., Miller-Ricci, E., & Sasselov, D., et al. 2008, ApJ, 689, 1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seager, S., Whitney, B. A., & Sasselov, D. D. 2000, ApJ, 540, 504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudarsky, D., Burrows, A., & Pinto, P. 2000, ApJ, 538, 885CrossRefGoogle Scholar