Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T23:01:13.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Highly accurate quantitative spectroscopy of massive stars in the Galaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2017

María-Fernanda Nieva
Affiliation:
Institut für Astro- und Teilchenphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25/8, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria email: [email protected]
Norbert Przybilla
Affiliation:
Institut für Astro- und Teilchenphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25/8, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Achieving high accuracy and precision in stellar parameter and chemical composition determinations is challenging in massive star spectroscopy. On one hand, the target selection for an unbiased sample build-up is complicated by several types of peculiarities that can occur in individual objects. On the other hand, composite spectra are often not recognized as such even at medium-high spectral resolution and typical signal-to-noise ratios, despite multiplicity among massive stars is widespread. In particular, surveys that produce large amounts of automatically reduced data are prone to oversight of details that turn hazardous for the analysis with techniques that have been developed for a set of standard assumptions applicable to a spectrum of a single star. Much larger systematic errors than anticipated may therefore result because of the unrecognized true nature of the investigated objects, or much smaller sample sizes of objects for the analysis than initially planned, if recognized. More factors to be taken care of are the multiple steps from the choice of instrument over the details of the data reduction chain to the choice of modelling code, input data, analysis technique and the selection of the spectral lines to be analyzed. Only when avoiding all the possible pitfalls, a precise and accurate characterization of the stars in terms of fundamental parameters and chemical fingerprints can be achieved that form the basis for further investigations regarding e.g. stellar structure and evolution or the chemical evolution of the Galaxy. The scope of the present work is to provide the massive star and also other astrophysical communities with criteria to evaluate the quality of spectroscopic investigations of massive stars before interpreting them in a broader context. The discussion is guided by our experiences made in the course of over a decade of studies of massive star spectroscopy ranging from the simplest single objects to multiple systems.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2017 

References

Briquet, M., et al., 2011, A&A, 527, A112 Google Scholar
Butler, K. & Giddings, J. R. 1981, Newsletter on Analysis of Astronomical Spectra, no. 9, University College of LondonGoogle Scholar
Castro, N., et al. 2017, A&A, 597, L6 Google Scholar
Cox, A. N. 2000, Allen’s astrophysical quantities, New York, AIP Press, SpringerGoogle Scholar
Ekström, S., et al. 2012, A&A, 537, A146 Google Scholar
Fossati, L., et al. 2015, A&A, 574, A20 Google Scholar
Giddings, J. R. 1981, Ph.D. thesis, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, J. F., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 437 Google Scholar
Hillier, D. J. & Miller, D. L., 1998, ApJ, 496, 407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubeny, I. & Lanz, T., 1995, ApJ, 439, 875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, I., et al. 2009, A&A, 496, 841 Google Scholar
Irrgang, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, L6 Google Scholar
Korn, A. J., Nieva, M. F., Daflon, S., & Cunha, K., 2005, ApJ, 633, 899 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurucz, R. 1993, CD-ROM No. 13, Cambridge, Mass.: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Google Scholar
Maeder, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 565, A39 Google Scholar
Maza, N. L., Nieva, M.-F., & Przybilla, N., 2014, A&A, 572, A112 Google Scholar
McSwain, M. V., Huang, W., & Gies, D. R., 2009, ApJ, 700, 1216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieva, M.-F., 2013, A&A, 550, A26 Google Scholar
Nieva, M. F. & Przybilla, N., 2007, A&A, 467, 295 Google Scholar
Nieva, M.-F. & Przybilla, N., 2012, A&A, 539, A143 Google Scholar
Nieva, M.-F. & Przybilla, N., 2014, A&A, 566, A7 Google Scholar
Przybilla, N., Butler, K., Becker, S. R., & Kudritzki, R. P., 2006, A&A, 445, 1099 Google Scholar
Przybilla, N., et al. 2010, A&A, 517, A38 Google Scholar
Przybilla, N., et al. 2016, A&A, 587, A7 Google Scholar
Puls, J., et al. 2005, A&A, 435, 669 Google Scholar