Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:45:53.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gravitational Waves and Time-Domain Astronomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

Joan Centrella ,
Samaya Nissanke  and
Roy Williams
Joan Centrella
Affiliation:
NASA Goddard Spaceflight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA email: [email protected]
Samaya Nissanke
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Roy Williams
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The gravitational-wave window onto the universe will open in roughly five years, when Advanced LIGO and Virgo achieve the first detections of high-frequency gravitational waves, most likely coming from compact binary mergers. Electromagnetic follow-up of these triggers, using radio, optical, and high energy telescopes, promises exciting opportunities in multi-messenger time-domain astronomy. In the decade, space-based observations of low-frequency gravitational waves from massive black hole mergers, and their electromagnetic counterparts, will open up further vistas for discovery. This two-part workshop featured brief presentations and stimulating discussions on the challenges and opportunities presented by gravitational-wave astronomy. Highlights from the workshop, with the emphasis on strategies for electromagnetic follow-up, are presented in this report.

Keywords

gravitational wavescompact binariestime domain astronomymulti-messenger astronomy
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 7 , Symposium S285: New Horizons in Time-Domain Astronomy , September 2011 , pp. 191 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

LSC 2010: Abadie, J., et al. , 2010, LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, Class. Quant. Grav., 27, 173001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LSC 2009: Abbott, B. P., et al. , 2009, LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, Reports on Progress in Physics, 72, 076901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LSC 2011c: Abbott, B. P., et al. , 2011c, LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.3498Google Scholar
Anderson, S & Williams, R.D.LIGO Data Management Plan https://dcc.ligo.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/RetrieveFile?docid=9967Google Scholar
Apostolatos, T., Kennefick, D., Ori, A., & Poisson, E. 1993, Phys.Rev., D47, 5376Google Scholar
Bartos, I., Finley, C., Corsi, A., & Marka, S. 2011, http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.3001Google Scholar
Cannon, K., et al. , 2011, submittedGoogle Scholar
Cutler, C. & Flanagan, E. 1994, Phys. Rev., D49:2658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairhurst, S. 2011, Class. Quantum Grav., 28, 105021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernique, P., Boch, T., et al. , 2011, http://aladin.u-strasbg.fr/Google Scholar
Finn, L. S. & Chernoff, D. F. 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 47:2198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harry, G. M., et al. , 2010, Class.Quant.Grav., 27:084006, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennrich, O. 2009, LISA technology and instrumentation. Class. Quant. Grav., 26:153001, 2009.Google Scholar
Kochanek, C. S., and Piran, T. 1993 ApJ, 417, L17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komossa, S. 2003, in: Centralla, J. M. (ed.), The Astrophysics of Gravitational Wave Sources, AIP Conf. No. 686, (Berlin: Springer), p. 161Google Scholar
Kulkarni, S., & Kasliwal, M.M.Proc. RIKEN Symp., Astrophysics with All-Sky X-Ray Observations, 312, arXiv:0903.0218Google Scholar
Kuroda, K., The LCGT Collaboration. 2010, Class. Quant. Grav., 27, 84004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L.-X. & Paczyński, B. 1998, ApJ, 507, L59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LSC 2011a: LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, 2011a, http://www.ligo.org/news/blind-injection.phpGoogle Scholar
LSC 2011b: LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration. 2011b, Mock data release GW100916 Colloq. ‘Big Dog Data’ http://www.ligo.org/science/GW100916Google Scholar
Metzger, B. D. & Berger, E. 2011, http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.6056Google Scholar
Samaya, M., Nissanke, J. L., Sievers, N. D., & Holz, D. E. 2011, ApJ, 739, 99Google Scholar
Schnittman, J. D. 2011, Class. Quant. Grav., 28, 94021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, B. F. 2011, Class. Quant. Grav., 28, 125023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sesana, A., Gair, J., Berti, E., & Volonteri, M. 2010, Phys. Rev., D83, 044036, 2011.Google Scholar
Singer, L., Price, L., & Speranza, A., https://dcc.ligo.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=G1100983Google Scholar
Sokolowski, M.http://grb.fuw.edu.pl/Google Scholar
Wen, L. & Chen, Y., Phys. Rev., D81:082001, 2010.Google Scholar
White, D. J., Daw, E. J., & Dhillon, V. S. 2011, Class. Quant. Grav., 28, 85016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wren, J., Vestrand, W. T., Wozniak, P., & Davis, H. 2010, SPIE Proc., 7737, 773723CrossRefGoogle Scholar