Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:49:16.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geomagnetopause Position and Shape Dependence on Solar Wind Plasma and IMF Parameters: Analytic Model Comparison with Observations and 3-D MHD Runs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2018

M. I. Verigin ,
G. A. Kotova Open the ORCID record for G. A. Kotova [Opens in a new window]  and
V. V. Bezrukikh
M. I. Verigin
Affiliation:
Space Research Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya, 84/32, Moscow, 117997, Russia, email: [email protected]
G. A. Kotova
Affiliation:
Space Research Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya, 84/32, Moscow, 117997, Russia, email: [email protected]
V. V. Bezrukikh
Affiliation:
Space Research Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya, 84/32, Moscow, 117997, Russia, email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is generally accepted to use the solar wind ram pressure ρV2 and the IMF Bz component for empirical description of the geo-magnetopause position and shape. A specific feature of the present paper is not to use the solar wind ρV2 but the thermal Pth and magnetic field Pmag pressures adjacent to the magnetopause for proper modelling. These pressures are deduced from the results of 3-D MHD runs and analytic solutions for post bow shock MHD flow in Lagrangian variables. The magnetopause shape variation due to Bz component changes the so called ‘doubling factor’ fd, which can be analytically deduced from a Tsyganenko magnetospheric field ellipsoidal model. Including all the above effects in our analytical model leads to a good description of ‘rapid’ magnetopause approach to the Earth for southward IMF and to its ‘stagnant’ behaviour with the increase of northward IMF component.

Keywords

Magnetopausesolar wind ram pressuremagnetic and thermal pressuredoubling factor
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 13 , Symposium S335: Space Weather of the Heliosphere: Processes and Forecasts , July 2017 , pp. 121 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Beard, D. B. 1964, Rev. Geophys. 2 (2), 335Google Scholar
Chao, J. K., Wu, D. J., Lin, C.-H., Yang, Y. H., Wang, X. Y., Kessel, M., Chen, S. H. & Lepping, R. P. 2002, in: Lyu, L.-H. (eds.), Space weather study using multipoint techniques, COSPAR Colloq. Ser., (Pergamon: Oxford), v.12, p.127Google Scholar
Dušík, Š., Granko, G., Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z. & Jelínek, K. 2010, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L19103, doi:10.1029/2010GL044965Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1959, Fluid Mechanics, (Pergamon Press: London)Google Scholar
Lin, R. L., Zhang, X. X., Liu, S. Q., Wang, Y. L. & Gong, J. C. 2010, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A04207. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014235Google Scholar
Liu, Z.-Q., Lu, J. Y., Wang, C., Kabin, K., Zhao, J. S., Wang, M., Han, J. P., Wang, J. Y. & Zhao, M. X. 2015, J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics, 120, 5645, doi:10.1002/2014JA020961Google Scholar
Lu, J. Y., Wang, M., Kabin, K., Zhao, J. S., Liu, Z.-Q., Zhao, M. X. & Li, G. 2015, Planetary and Space Science, 106 (2), 108Google Scholar
Petrinec, S. M. & Russell, C. T. 1996, J. Geophys. Res., 101 (A1), 137Google Scholar
Sibeck, D. G., Lopez, R. E. & Roelof, R. C. 1991, J. Geophys. Res., 96 (A4), 5489Google Scholar
Shue, J.-H., Chao, J. K., Fu, H. C., Russell, C. T., Song, P., Khurana, K. K. & Singer, H. J. 1997, J. Geophys. Res., 102 (A5), 9497. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JA00196Google Scholar
Shue, J.-H., Song, P., Russell, C. T., Steinberg, J T., Chao, J. K., Zastenker, G., Vaisberg, O. L., Kokubun, S., Singer, H. J., Detman, T. R. & Kawano, H. 1998, J. Geophys. Res. 103 (A8), 17691. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JA01103Google Scholar
Shugaev, F. V. & Kalinchenko, A. P. 2005, in: Bityurin, V. A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 15 International Conference on MHD Energy Conversion and the 6 International Workshop on Magnetoplasma Aerodynamics, (IVTAN: Moscow), v.2, p.617Google Scholar
Stahara, S. S. 2002, Planet. and Space Sci., 50, 421Google Scholar
Tsyganenko, N. A. 1989, Planet. and Space Sci., 37 (9), 1037Google Scholar
Verigin, M. I., Kotova, G. A., Bezrukikh, V. V., Zastenker, G. N. & Nikolaeva, N. F. 2009, Geomagn. and Aeronomy, 49 (8), 1176Google Scholar
Verigin, M., Tatrallyay, M., Erdos, G., Kotova, G., Bezrukikh, V. & Remizov, A. 2014, The 40-th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, 2–10 Aug. 2014, Moscow, Russia, Abstract D3.5-0014-14, 2014Google Scholar
Verigin, M. I., Kotova, G. A., Bezrukikh, V. V. & Remizov, A. P. 2015, EPSC Abstracts, v. 10, EPSC2015-708Google Scholar