Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:43:44.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gas flows within the Galaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2010

Francoise Combes
Francoise Combes*
Affiliation:
LERMA, Observatoire de Paris, 61 Av. de l'Observatoire, F-75014, Paris email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the recent years, more and more sophisticated models have been proposed for the gas distribution and kinematics in the Milky Way, taking into account the main bar, but also the possible nuclear bar, with the same or different pattern-speed. I review the success and problems encountered by the models, in particular in view of the new discovery of a symmetrical far-side counterpart of the 3 kpc arm. The inner part, dominated by the bar, and the outer parts, dominated by the spiral arms, can be observed from a virtual solar position, and the errors coming from kinematical distances are evaluated. The appearance of four arms could be due to a deprojection bias.

Keywords

Galaxydynamicsinterstellar mediumbarskinematics
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Highlights H15: Highlights of Astronomy , November 2009 , pp. 186 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Alard, C., 2001, A&A, 379, L44Google Scholar
Amores, E. B., Lépine, J., & Mishurov, Y., 2009, MNRAS, in press (astro-ph:0907.4822)Google Scholar
Bally, J., Stark, A. A., Wilson, R. W., & Henkel, C., 1988, ApJ, 324, 223Google Scholar
Binney, J., Gerhard, O. E., Stark, A. A., Bally, J., & Uchida, K. I., 2001, MNRAS, 252, 210Google Scholar
Bissantz, N., Englmaier, P., & Gerhard, O., 2003, MNRAS, 340, 949Google Scholar
Combes, F., Debbasch, F., Friedli, D., & Pfenniger, D., 1990, A&A, 233, 82Google Scholar
Dame, T.M., Hartmann, D., & Thaddeus, P., 2001, ApJ, 547, 792Google Scholar
Dame, T. M. & Thaddeus, P., 2008, ApJ, 683, L143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englmaier, P., Pohl, M., & Bissantz, N., 2009, Mem Societa Astron Italiana (astro-ph:0812.3491)Google Scholar
Fux, R., 1999, A&A, 345, 787Google Scholar
Georgelin, Y. M. & Georgelin, Y. P., 1976, A&A 49, 57Google Scholar
Levine, E. S., Blitz, L., & Heiles, C., 2006, Science, 312, 1773Google Scholar
Liszt, H. & Burton, B., 1980, ApJ, 236, 779Google Scholar
Lopez-Corredoira, M., Cabrera-Lavers, A., & Gerhard, O., 2005, A&A, 439, 107Google Scholar
Nakanishi, H. & Sofue, Y., 2006, PASJ, 58, 847Google Scholar
Pohl, M., Englmaier, P., & Bissantz, N., 2008, ApJ, 677, 283Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Fernandez, N. & Combes, F., 2008, A&AGoogle Scholar
Sawada, T., Hasegawa, T., Handa, T. & Cohen, R. J., 2004, MNRAS, 349, 1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellwood, J. A. & Sparke, L. S., 1988, MNRAS, 231, 25pGoogle Scholar