Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:09:42.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gas flows in a changing-look AGN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2021

Sandra I. Raimundo*
Affiliation:
DARK, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Lyngbyvej 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The galaxy Mrk 590 is one of the few known ‘changing-look’ Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) to have transitioned between states twice, having just increased its flux after a period of ˜10 years of low activity. In addition to the increase in flux, the optical broad emission lines have reappeared but show a different profile than what was observed before they disappeared. The gas motions in the host galaxy of this changing-look AGN show outflows and dynamical structures able to drive gas to the nucleus, suggesting an interplay between inflow and outflow in the centre of the galaxy.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Denney, K. D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 134 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elitzur, M., Ho, L. C., Trump, J. R., et al. 2014, Mnras, 438, 3340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fathi, K., Storchi-Bergmann, T., Riffel, R. A., et al. 2006, ApJl, 641, L25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 078001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. O., et al. 2019, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 13330, 1 Google Scholar
Koay, J. Y., Vestergaard, M., Casasola, V., et al. 2016a, Mnras, 455, 2745 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koay, J. Y., Vestergaard, M., Bignall, H. E., et al. 2016b, Mnras, 460, 304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, C. L., et al. 2018, AJ, 155, 6 10.3847/1538-3881/aa99daCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maciejewski, W. 2004, Mnras, 354, 892 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08254.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathur, S., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noda, H. & Done, C., 2018, Mnras, 480, 3898 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, B. M., Wanders, I., Bertram, R., et al. 1998, ApJ, 501, 82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, B. M., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raimundo, S. I., Vestergaard, M., Koay, J. Y., et al. 2019a, Mnras, 486, 123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raimundo, S. I., Pancoast, A., Vestergaard, M., et al. 2019b, Mnras, 489, 1899 10.1093/mnras/stz2243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raimundo, S. I., Vestergaard, M., Goad, M. R., et al. 2020, Mnras, 493, 1227 10.1093/mnras/staa285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, N. P., et al. 2018, Mnras, 480, 4468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruan, J. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826, 188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumbaugh, N., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, J. N., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 33 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 27 10.3847/1538-4357/aac726CrossRefGoogle Scholar