Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:38:50.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Galactocentric distance of the Sun derived from kinematic data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

Zi Zhu
Affiliation:
School of Astronomy and Space Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China email: [email protected] Key Laboratory of Modern Astronomy and Astrophysics (Nanjing University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210093, China
Ming Shen
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Based on radial velocity data and Hipparcos proper motions, we present a new determination of the Galactocentric distance based on a purely kinematic model. We have selected three subgroups of Galactic thin-disk components (O–B5 stars, classical Cepheids and Galactic open clusters) to trace the local structure and kinematics of the Galactic disk. Adopting the approximation of axisymmetric circular rotation, we have derived the Sun's distance to the Galactic Center, R0 = 8.25 ± 0.79 kpc based on O–B5 stars, R0 = 7.98 ± 0.79 kpc based on Galactic Cepheids and R0 = 8.03 ± 0.70 kpc using open clusters, all of which are in excellent agreement with the current-best estimate of the Galactocentric distance.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Avedisova, A. S. 2005, Astron. Rep., 46, 435Google Scholar
Dehnen, W. & Binney, J. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, W. S., Lépine, J. R. D., Bruno, S. A., & Moitinho, A. 2006, Open clusters and Galactic structure, http://www.astro.iag.usp.br/~wiltonGoogle Scholar
Kerr, F. J. & Lynden-Bell, D. 1985, MNRAS, 221, 1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kharchenko, N. V., Piskunov, A. E., Röser, S., Schilbach, E., & Scholtz, R. D. 2005, A&A, 438, 1163Google Scholar
Malkin, Z. 2012, arXiv:1202.6128Google Scholar
Reid, M. J. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 345Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, F. 2007, A&A, 474, 653Google Scholar
Zhang, H. & Zhu, Z. 2009, Chin. Sci. Bull., 54, 3790CrossRefGoogle Scholar