Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:06:11.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Forming the Progenitors of Explosive Stellar Transients

Invited talk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2019

S. Justham
S. Justham*
Affiliation:
University, and National Observatory, of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Explosive stellar transients arise from diverse situations, including deaths of massive stars, a variety of thermonuclear outbursts, and compact-object mergers. Stellar interactions are heavily implicated in explaining the observed populations of events, and not only those where binarity is obviously involved. Relationships between these classes probably help to elucidate our understanding; for example; the production of double neutron-star mergers from field binaries is thought to be heavily biased towards routes involving stripped core-collapse supernovæ. As we gain an ever more synoptic view of the changing sky, theorists should be mindful of developing an ability to take robust quantitative advantage of the available population information to help constrain the physics. This is complementary to aiming for deep understanding of individual events.

Keywords

Stars: binaries: closeblue stragglersevolutionnovæcataclysmic variablesbinaries: generalsupernovæ: generalX-rays: binaries
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 14 , Symposium S339: Southern Horizons in Time-Domain Astronomy , November 2017 , pp. 33 - 38
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2019 

References

Arcavi, I., Howell, D. A., Kasen, D., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 21010.1038/nature24030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baade, W., & Zwicky, F. 1934, Proc. Nat. Academy of Science, 20, 254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell, K. M., Mioduszewski, A. J., Muxlow, T. W. B., Podsiadlowski, P., & Rupen, M. P. 2001, ApJ, 562, L7910.1086/324573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. E. 1995, ApJ, 440, 270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewi, J. D. M., Podsiadlowski, P., & Sena, A. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gies, D. R., Dieterich, S., Richardson, N. D., et al. 2008, ApJ, 682, L117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjellming, M. S., & Webbink, R. F. 1987, ApJ, 318, 794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, N., Justham, S., Avendano Nandez, J. L., & Lombardi, J. C. 2013a, Science, 339, 43310.1126/science.1225540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, N., Justham, S., Chen, X., et al. 2013b, A&AR, 21, 59Google Scholar
Justham, S., Podsiadlowski, P., & Han, Z. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Justham, S., Podsiadlowski, P., & Vink, J. S. 2014, ApJ, 796, 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. R., Taam, R. E., & Begelman, M. C. 2000, ApJ, 530, L25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobulnicky, H. A., & Fryer, C. L. 2007, ApJ, 670, 74710.1086/522073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkowski, R. 1941, PASP, 53, 224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paczynski, B. 1976, in: Eggleton, P., Mitton, S., & Whelan, J. (eds.), Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems, Proc. IAUS 73 (Reidel, Dordrecht), p. 75Google Scholar
Paczyński, B., & Sienkiewicz, R. 1972, AcA, 22, 73Google Scholar
Pasquali, A., Nota, A., Langer, N., Schulte-Ladbeck, R. E., & Clampin, M. 2000, AJ, 119, 1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsiadlowski, P. 2001, in: Podsiadlowski, P., Rappaport, S., King, A. R., et al. (eds.), Evolution of Binary and Multiple Star Systems, ASPCS, 229, p. 239Google Scholar
Podsiadlowski, P. 2010, New Astron. Rev. 54, 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsiadlowski, P., Joss, P. C., & Hsu, J. J. L. 1992, ApJ, 391, 24610.1086/171341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsiadlowski, P., Rappaport, S., & Pfahl, E. D. 2002, ApJ, 565, 1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pols, O. R. 1994, A&A, 290, 119Google Scholar
Rappaport, S., Podsiadlowski, P., & Horev, I. 2009, ApJ, 698, 666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. 2012, Science, 337, 444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şener, H. T., & Jeffery, C. S. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 2676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauris, T. M., Kramer, M., Freire, P. C. C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 846, 170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tylenda, R., & Soker, N. 2006, A&A, 451, 223Google Scholar
Tylenda, R., Hajduk, M., Kamiński, T., et al. 2011, A&A, 528, A114Google Scholar