Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:27:57.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Flat Faint End of the Fornax Cluster Galaxy Luminosity Function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2007

S. Mieske ,
M. Hilker ,
L. Infante  and
C. Mendes de Oliveira
S. Mieske
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str.2, 85748 Garching b. München, Germany email: [email protected], [email protected]
M. Hilker
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str.2, 85748 Garching b. München, Germany email: [email protected], [email protected]
L. Infante
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomía y Astrofísica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile email: [email protected]
C. Mendes de Oliveira
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica, e Ciências Atmosféricas, Departamento de Astronomia, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matáo 1226, Cidade Universitãria, 05508-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We analyse the photometric properties of the early-type Fornax cluster dwarf galaxy population (MV > −17 mag), based on a wide field imaging study of the central cluster area in V and I band-passes with IMACS/Magellan at Las Campanas Observatory. We create a fiducial sample of ~ 100 Fornax cluster dwarf ellipticals (dEs) with −16.6 < MV < −8.8 mag in the following three steps: (1) To verify cluster membership, we measured I-band surface brightness fluctuations (SBF) distances to candidate dEs known from previous surveys; (2) We re-assessed morphological classifications for those candidate dEs that are too faint for SBF detection; and (3) We searched for new candidate dEs in the size-luminosity regime close to the resolution limit of previous surveys. The resulting fiducial dE sample follows a well-defined surface brightness – magnitude relation, showing that Fornax dEs are about 40% larger than Local Group dEs. The sample also defines a colour-magnitude relation similar to that of Local Group dEs. The early-type dwarf galaxy luminosity function in Fornax has a very flat faint end slope α ≃ −1.1 ± 0.1. We compare the number of dwarfs per unit mass with those in other environments and find that the Fornax cluster fits well into a general trend of a lack of high-mass dwarfs in more massive environments.

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: individual: Fornax cluster – galaxies: dwarf – galaxies: fundamental parameters – galaxies: luminosity function –techniques: photometric
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S244: Dark Galaxies and Lost Baryons , June 2007 , pp. 331 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Andreon, S., Cuillandre, J. C., Puddu, E., & Mellier, Y. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekki, K., Couch, W. J., Drinkwater, M. J., & Shioya, Y. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Côté, P., Marzke, R. O., & West, M. J. 1998, ApJ, 501, 554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drinkwater, M. J., Gregg, M. D., Holman, B. A., & Brown, M. J. I. 2001, MNRAS 326, 1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drinkwater, M. J., Gregg, M. D., Hilker, M., et al. , 2003, Nature, 423, 519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eke, V. R., et al. , 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, H. C., & Sandage, A. 1988, AJ, 96, 1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grebel, E. K., Gallagher, J. S., & Harbeck, D. 2003, AJ, 125, 1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilker, M., Infante, L., Vieira, G., Kissler-Patig, M., & Richtler, T. 1999a, A&AS, 134, 75Google Scholar
Hilker, M., Infante, L., & Richtler, T. 1999b, A&AS, 138, 55Google Scholar
Hilker, M., Mieske, S., & Infante, L. 2003, A&AL, 397, L9Google Scholar
Infante, L., Mieske, S., & Hilker, M. 2003, Ap& SS, 285, 87Google Scholar
Kauffmann, G., & Haehnelt, M. 2000, MNRAS 311, 576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, A., Frenk, C. S., White, S. D. M., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kambas, A., Davies, J. I., Smith, R. M., Bianchi, S., & Haynes, J. A. 2000, AJ 120, 1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lokas, E. L., Bode, P., & Hoffman, Y. 2004, MNRAS, 349, 595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamon, G. A., Sanchis, T., Salvador-Solé, E., & Solanes, J. M. 2004, A&A, 414, 445Google Scholar
Mieske, S., Hilker, M., Infante, L., & Jordán, A. 2006, AJ, 131, 2442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mieske, S., Hilker, M., Infante, L., & Mendes de Oliveira, C. 2007, A&A in press, astro-ph/0706.2724Google Scholar
Mobasher, B., et al. , 2003, ApJ, 587, 605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, B., Ghigna, S., Governato, F., et al. 1999, ApJL, 524, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatini, S., et al. , 2003, MNRAS, 341, 981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, A., Binggeli, B., & Tammann, G. A. 1985, AJ, 90, 1759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, M., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, J. L., & Schneider, D. P. 1988, AJ, 96, 807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, J. L., Blakeslee, J. P., Ajhar, E. A., & Dressler, A. 2000, ApJ, 530, 625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trentham, N., & Tully, R. B. 2002, MNRAS 335, 712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trentham, N., Sampson, L., & Banerji, M. 2005, MNRAS, 357, 783CrossRefGoogle Scholar