Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:20:35.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

[FeII] as a shock tracer in NGC 253

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2013

Marissa J. F. Rosenberg ,
Paul P. van der Werf  and
Frank P. Israel
Marissa J. F. Rosenberg
Affiliation:
Leiden Observatory, Universiteit Leiden, NL-2300CA, Leiden, the Netherlands email: [email protected]
Paul P. van der Werf
Affiliation:
Leiden Observatory, Universiteit Leiden, NL-2300CA, Leiden, the Netherlands email: [email protected]
Frank P. Israel
Affiliation:
Leiden Observatory, Universiteit Leiden, NL-2300CA, Leiden, the Netherlands email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Supernovae play an integral role in the feedback of processed material back into the interstellar medium (ISM) of galaxies and are responsible for most of the chemical enrichment of the universe. The rate of supernovae can also reveal the star formation histories. In a sample of 11 nearby galaxies observed with SINFONI, a strong linear correlation between [FeII]1.26 luminosity and Starburst 99-derived supernova rate is found on a pixel-pixel basis. In the very nearby archetypal starburst galaxy NGC 253, the excitation of molecular gas is a subject of debate. Using the correlation between [FeII] and supernova rate, we can determine if supernovae can account for the excitation of the bright observed near-infrared H2 emission.

Keywords

supernovae: general — instrumentation: high angular resolution — galaxies: individual (NGC 253)
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S292: Molecular Gas, Dust, and Star Formation in Galaxies , August 2012 , pp. 295 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Engelbracht, C. W., Rieke, M. J., Rieke, G. H., Kelly, D. M., & Achtermann, J. M. 1998, ApJ, 505, 639Google Scholar
Garcia-Burillo, S., Martin-Pintado, J., Fuente, A., & Neri, R. 2000, ApJS, 355, 499Google Scholar
Harrison, A., Puxley, P., Russell, A., & Brand, P. 1998, MNRAS, 297, 624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, S., Martin-Pintado, J., & Viti, S. 2009, ApJ, 706, 1323Google Scholar
Martin, S., Mauersberger, R., Martin-Pintado, J., Henkel, C., & Garcia-Burillo, S. 2006, ApJS, 164, 450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller-Sanchez, F., Gonzalez-Martin, O., Fernandez-Ontiveros, J. A., Acosta-Pulido, J. A., & Prieto, M. A. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. J. F., Van der Werf, P. P. & Israel, F. P. 2012, A&A, 540, 116Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. J. F., Van der Werf, P. P. & Israel, F. P. 2012, A&A submittedGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, A. & Dalgarno, A. 1989, ApJ, 338, 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulvestad, J. S. & Antonucci, R. R. J. 1997, ApJ, 716, 1166Google Scholar