Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:51:17.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The extended stellar substructures of four metal-poor globular clusters in the Galactic bulge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2016

Sang-Hyun Chun  and
Young-Jong Sohn
Sang-Hyun Chun
Affiliation:
Yonsei University Observatory, 120-749 Seoul, Korea email: [email protected]
Young-Jong Sohn
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, 120-749, Seoul, Korea email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We investigated the stellar density substructures around four metal-poor globular clusters (NGC 6266, NGC 6626, NGC 6642, and NGC 6723) in the Galactic bulge. Wide-field near-infrared (JHKs) imaging data were obtained from WFCAM of UKIRT telescope. Field stars contamination around the globular clusters was reduced by using a statistical weighted filtering algorithm. Tidal stripping stellar substructures in the form of tidal tail (NGC 6266 and NGC 6626) or small density lobes/chunk (NGC 6642 and NGC 6723) were found around the four globular clusters in the two-dimensional density contour maps. We also find the overdensity features, which deviate from the theoretical models, in the outer region of radial density profiles. The observed results imply that the four globular clusters have experienced a strong tidal force or the bulge/disk shock effect of the Galaxy.

Keywords

Globular clustersTidal tail
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 11 , Issue S317: The General Assembly of Galaxy Halos: Structure, Origin and Evolution , August 2015 , pp. 286 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Bullock, J. S., Kratsov, A. V., & Weinberg, D. H. 2001, ApJ, 548, 33Google Scholar
Bullock, J. S. & Johnston, K. V. 2005, ApJ, 635, 931Google Scholar
Chun, S.-H., Kim, J.-W., Kim, M.-J., et al. 2012, AJ, 144, 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grillmair, C. J., Freeman, K. C., Irwin, M., & Quinn, P. J. 1995, AJ, 109, 2553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, I. R. 1966, AJ, 71, 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, B., Ghigna, S., Governato, F., et al. 1999, ApJ, 524, L19Google Scholar
Odenkirchen, M., Grebel, E. K., Dehnen, W., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 2385Google Scholar
Trager, S. C., King, Ivan R., & Djorgovski, S. 1995, AJ, 109, 218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C. P. 1975, AJ, 80, 175Google Scholar