Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:41:33.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolutionary properties of stellar standard candles: Red clump, AGB clump and white dwarfs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

Maurizio Salaris
Maurizio Salaris*
Affiliation:
Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, 12 Quays House, Birkenhead, CH41 1LD, UK email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The location of the white dwarf cooling sequence in the colour–magnitude diagram of simple stellar populations, the magnitude of the red clump and the magnitude of the asymptotic giant branch clump are three stellar distance indicators based on advanced evolutionary phases of low-mass stars. With the present observational capabilities, they can be applied to reach distances ranging from the Galactic disk and halo populations, to galaxies within the Local Group. Techniques devised to exploit these distance indicators are presented, together with a discussion of their calibration and the main sources of systematic errors. A first semi-empirical calibration of the asymptotic giant branch absolute magnitude in both the I and K bands is also derived.

Keywords

stars: AGB and post-AGBstars: distancesstars: horizontal- branchwhite dwarfs
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S289: Advancing the Physics of Cosmic Distances , August 2012 , pp. 145 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Alves, D. R., Rejkuba, M., Minniti, D., & Cook, K. H. 2002, ApJ, 573, L51Google Scholar
Beccari, G., Ferraro, F. R., Lanzoni, B., & Bellazzini, M. 2006, ApJ, 652, L121Google Scholar
Castellani, V., Chieffi, A., & Pulone, L. 1991, ApJS, 76, 911Google Scholar
Girardi, L. & Salaris, M. 2001, MNRAS, 323, 109Google Scholar
Girardi, L., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Weiss, A., & Salaris, M. 1998, MNRAS, 301, 149Google Scholar
Percival, S. M. & Salaris, M. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 539Google Scholar
Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., & Castelli, F. 2004, ApJ, 612, 168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., & Castelli, F. 2006, ApJ, 642, 797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietrzyński, G., Górski, M., Gieren, W., Laney, D., Udalski, A., & Ciechanowska, A. 2010, AJ, 140, 1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renzini, A., et al. 1996, ApJ, 465, L23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaris, M. & Girardi, L. 2002, MNRAS, 337, 332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaris, M., García-Berro, E., Hernanz, M., Isern, J., & Saumon, D. 2000, ApJ, 544, 1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaris, M., Cassisi, S., García-Berro, E., Isern, J., & Torres, S. 2001, A&A, 371, 921Google Scholar
Salaris, M., Held, E. V., Ortolani, S., Gullieuszik, M., & Momany, Y. 2007, A&A, 476, 243Google Scholar
Salaris, M., Serenelli, A., Weiss, A. & Miller Bertolami, M. 2009, ApJ, 692, 1013Google Scholar
Stanek, K. Z. & Garnavich, P. M. 1998, ApJ, 503, L131Google Scholar
Thompson, I. B., et al. 2010, AJ, 139, 329Google Scholar