Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:37:10.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EMP stars with high mass IMF and hierarchical galaxy formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

Yutaka Komiya ,
Takuma Suda ,
Asao Habe  and
Masayuki Y. Fujimoto
Yutaka Komiya
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8588, Japan
Takuma Suda
Affiliation:
Astrophysics Group, EPSAM, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK
Asao Habe
Affiliation:
Department of Cosmoscience, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan
Masayuki Y. Fujimoto
Affiliation:
Department of Cosmoscience, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Extremely metal-poor (EMP) stars in the Galactic halo are stars formed in the very early stage of the chemical evolution of the Galaxy. In previous study, we proposed that typical mass of EMP stars are massive, based on observations of carbon-enhanced EMP stars. In this study, we build a merger tree of the Galaxy semi-analytically and follow the chemical evolution along the merger tree. We also consider the effect of binary and high-mass initial mass function(IMF). Resultant theoretical metallicity distribution function (MDF) and abundance distribution are compared with observed metal-poor halo stars.

Keywords

stars: abundancesstars: Population IIGalaxy: evolutionGalaxy: halo
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S265: Chemical Abundances in the Universe: Connecting First Stars to Planets , August 2009 , pp. 128 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Aoki, W., Norris, J. E., Ryan, S. G., Beers, T. C., & Ando, H., 2002, ApJ, 567, 1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beers, T. C., Preston, G. W., & Shectman, S. A. 1992, aj, 103, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christlieb, N., Green, P. J., et al. 2001, A&A, 375, 366Google Scholar
Fujimoto, M. Y., Iben, I. Jr., & Hollowell, D. 1990, ApJ, 349, 580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, C., Umeda, H., Nomoto, K., Tominaga, N., & Ohkubo, T. 2006, 653, 1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komiya, Y., Suda, T., Minaguchi, H., et al. 2007 ApJ, 658, 367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komiya, Y., Suda, T., & Fujimoto, Y. M. 2009a, ApJ, 694, 1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komiya, Y., Suda, T., & Fujimoto, Y. M. 2009b, ApJL, 696, L79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomoto, K., Thielemann, F.-K., & Yokoi, K., 1984, 286, 644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, S. C. F., Beers, T. C., & Sneden, C. 1999, ASP Conf. Ser. 165, 65, 264Google Scholar
Somerville, R. S. & Kolatt, T. S. 1999, MNRAS, 305, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suda, T., Aikawa, M., Machida, , et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umeda, H. & Nomoto, K. 2002, ApJ, 565, 385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woosley, S. E. & Weaver, T. A.ApJS, 101, 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar