Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:43:27.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embryo to Ashes Complete Evolutionary Tracks, Hands-off

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

O. Yaron ,
A. Kovetz  and
D. Prialnik
O. Yaron
Affiliation:
Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences
A. Kovetz
Affiliation:
Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences School of Physics & Astronomy, Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Israel
D. Prialnik
Affiliation:
Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a new stellar evolution code and a set of results, showing its capability to calculate full evolutionary tracks for a wide range of masses and metalicities. The code is meant to be used also in the context of modeling the evolution of dense stellar systems, for performing live evolutionary calculations both for ‘normal’ ZAMS/PRE-MS models, but mainly for ‘non-canonical’ (i.e. merger-products) stellar configurations. For such tasks, it has to be robust and efficient, capable to run through all phases of stellar evolution without interruption or intervention. Here we show a few examples of evolutionary calculations for stellar populations I and II, and for masses in the range 0.25–64 M⊙.

Keywords

stars: evolutionHertzsprung-Russell diagram
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S246: Dynamical Evolution of Dense Stellar Systems , September 2007 , pp. 475 - 476
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Bloecker, T. 1995 A&A 297, 727Google Scholar
Bowen, G. H. 1988 ApJ 329, 299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassisi, S., Potekhin, A. Y., Pietrinferni, A., Catelan, M., & Salaris, M. 2007 ApJ 661, 1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughlan, G. R. & Fowler, W. A. 1988 Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 40, 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggleton, P. P. 1971, MNRAS 151, 351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, J. W., Alexander, D. R., et al. 2005 ApJ 623, 585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias, C. A. & Rogers, F. J. 1996, ApJ 464, 943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itoh, N., Hayashi, H., Nishikawa, A., & Kohyama, Y. 1996 ApJS 102, 411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pols, O. R., Tout, C. A., Eggleton, P. P. & Han, Z. 1995, MNRAS 274, 964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimers, D. 1975 MSRSL 8, 369Google Scholar