Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:47:23.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamical Modeling of the Milky Way Bugle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2014

Juntai Shen*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Research in Galaxies and Cosmology, Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 80 Nandan Road, Shanghai 200030, China email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Bulges are commonly believed to form in the dynamical violence of galaxy collisions and mergers. We model the stellar kinematics of the Bulge Radial Velocity Assay (BRAVA) and find no sign that the Milky Way contains a classical bulge formed by scrambling pre-existing disks of stars in major mergers. Rather, the bulge appears to be a bar seen somewhat end-on, as hinted from its asymmetric boxy shape. We construct a simple but realistic N-body model of the Galaxy that self-consistently develops a bar. The bar immediately buckles and thickens in the vertical direction. As seen from the Sun, the result resembles the boxy bulge of our Galaxy. We use the new kinematic constraints to show that the classical bulge contribution cannot be very significant. The model fits the BRAVA stellar kinematic data covering the whole bulge strikingly well with no need for a merger-made classical bulge. Our model contains an intriguing vertical X-shaped structure that resembles the similar structure reported recently in the Galactic bulge. The existence of the vertical X-shaped structure also suggests that the formation of the Milky Way bulge is shaped mainly by internal disk dynamical instabilities.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Beaulieu, S. F., Freeman, K. C., Kalnajs, A. J., Saha, P., & Zhao, H. 2000, AJ, 120, 855Google Scholar
Bissantz, N., Debattista, V. P., & Gerhard, O. 2004, ApJL, 601, L155Google Scholar
Blitz, L. & Spergel, D. N. 1991, ApJ, 379, 631Google Scholar
Bureau, M., Aronica, G., Athanassoula, E., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, W., et al. 2008, ApJ, 684, 1110Google Scholar
Fux, R. 1997, A&A, 327, 983Google Scholar
Gerhard, O., & Martinez-Valpuesta, I. 2012, ApJL, 744, L8Google Scholar
Howard, C. D., et al. 2009, ApJL, 702, L153Google Scholar
Howard, C. D., Rich, R. M., Reitzel, D. B., Koch, A., De Propris, R., & Zhao, H. 2008, ApJ, 688, 1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J. 1993, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 153, Galactic Bulges, ed. Dejonghe, H. & Habing, H. J. (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 209Google Scholar
Kormendy, J., & Kennicutt, R. C. 2004, ARAA, 42, 603Google Scholar
Kunder, A., Koch, A., Rich, R. M., et al. 2012, AJ, 143, 57Google Scholar
Li, Z.-Y. & Shen, J. 2012, ApJL, 757, L7Google Scholar
Maihara, T., Oda, N., Sugiyama, T., & Okuda, H. 1978, PASJ, 30, 1Google Scholar
McWilliam, A. & Rich, R. M. 1994, ApJS, 91, 749Google Scholar
McWilliam, A. & Zoccali, M. 2010, ApJ, 724, 1491 (MZ10)Google Scholar
Nataf, D. M., Udalski, A., Gould, A., Fouqué, P., & Stanek, K. Z. 2010, ApJL, 721, L28Google Scholar
Raha, N., Sellwood, J. A., James, R. A., & Kahn, F. D. 1991, Nature, 352, 411Google Scholar
Rangwala, N., Williams, T. B., & Stanek, K. Z. 2009, ApJ, 691, 1387Google Scholar
Rattenbury, N. J., Mao, S., Sumi, T., & Smith, M. C. 2007, MNRAS, 378, 1064Google Scholar
Rich, R. M., Reitzel, D. B., Howard, C. D., & Zhao, H. 2007, ApJL, 658, L29Google Scholar
Saito, R. K., Zoccali, M., McWilliam, A., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 76Google Scholar
Shen, J. & Sellwood, J. A. 2004, ApJ, 604, 614Google Scholar
Shen, J., Rich, R. M., Kormendy, J., et al. 2010, ApJL, 720, L72Google Scholar
Stanek, K. Z., Mateo, M., Udalski, A., et al. 1994, ApJL, 429, L73Google Scholar
Stanek, K. Z., & Garnavich, P. M. 1998, ApJL, 503, L131Google Scholar
Weiland, J. L., et al. 1994, ApJL, 425, L81Google Scholar
Zhao, H. S. 1996, MNRAS, 283, 149Google Scholar
Zoccali, M., Hill, V., Lecureur, A., Barbuy, B., Renzini, A., Minniti, D., Gómez, A., & Ortolani, S. 2008, A&A, 486, 177Google Scholar