Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:47:57.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic models of the sun from the convection zone to the chromosphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Sven Wedemeyer-Böhm
Sven Wedemeyer-Böhm*
Affiliation:
Kiepenheuer-Institut für Sonnenphysik, Schöneckstr. 6, 79104 Freiburg, Germany email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The chromosphere in internetwork regions of the quiet Sun was regarded as a static and homogeneous layer for a long time. Thanks to advances in observations and numerical modelling, the wave nature of these atmospheric regions received increasing attention during the last decade. Recent three-dimensional radiation magnetohydrodynamic simulations with CO5BOLD feature the chromosphere of internetwork regions as a dynamic and intermittent phenomenon. It is a direct product of interacting waves that form a mesh-like pattern of hot shock fronts and cool post-shock regions. The waves are excited self-consistently at the top of the convection zone. In the middle chromosphere above an average height of 1000 km, plasma beta gets larger than one and magnetic fields become more important. The model chromosphere exhibits a magnetic field that is much more homogeneous than in the layers below and evolves much faster. That includes fast propagating (MHD) waves. Further improvements of the simulations like time-dependent hydrogen ionisation are currently in progress. This class of models is capable of explaining apparently contradicting diagnostics such as carbon monoxide and UV emission at the same time.

Keywords

ConvectionhydrodynamicsMHDradiative transfershock wavesSun: chromospheregranulationphotosphereradio radiationUV radiation
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 2 , Symposium S239: Convection in Astrophysics , August 2006 , pp. 52 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Asensio Ramos, A., Trujillo Bueno, J., Carlsson, M. & Cernicharo, J. 2003, ApJL 588, L61Google Scholar
Carlsson, M. & Stein, R. F. 1995, ApJL 440, L29Google Scholar
Fossum, A. & Carlsson, M. 2005, Nature 435, 919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freytag, B., Steffen, M. & Dorch, B. 2002, Astron. Nachr. 323, 2133.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handy, B. N., Acton, L. W., Kankelborg, C. C. et al. , 1999, Solar Phys. 187, 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höfner, S., Gautschy-Loidl, R., Aringer, B. et al. , 2004, in: Käufl, H.U., Siebenmorgen, R., Moorwood, A. (eds.), ESO Workshop “High Resolution Infrared Spectroscopy in Astronomy’, Springer, 11PGoogle Scholar
Janssen, K. & Cauzzi, G. 2006, A&A 450, 365Google Scholar
Kurucz, R. L. 1970, SAO Special Report 308Google Scholar
Leenaarts, J. & Wedemeyer-Böhm, S. 2005, A&A 431, 687Google Scholar
Leenaarts, J. & Wedemeyer-Böhm, S. 2006, in: Leibacher, J., Uitenbroek, H., and Stein, R. (eds.), Proc. of NSO Workshop No. 23, in pressGoogle Scholar
Leenaarts, J. & Wedemeyer-Böhm, S., A&A, in press (L06)Google Scholar
Loukitcheva, M., Solanki, S. K. & White, S. 2006, A&A 456, 713Google Scholar
Schaffenberger, W., Wedemeyer-Böhm, S., Steiner, O. & Freytag, B. 2005, in: Innes, D. E., Lagg, A. & Solanki, S. A. (eds.), ESA SP-596: Chromospheric and Coronal Magnetic Fields, 65 (S05)Google Scholar
Schneider, G., Pasachoff, J. M. & Golub, L. 2004, Icarus 168, 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skartlien, R., Stein, R. F. & Nordlund, Å. 2000, ApJ 541, 468Google Scholar
Stein, R. F. & Nordlund, A. 1989, ApJL 342, L95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, R. F. & Nordlund, Å. 2006, ApJ 642, 1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trujillo Bueno, J., Shchukina, N. & Asensio Ramos, A. 2004, Nature 430, 326Google Scholar
Uitenbroek, H. 2000a, ApJ 531, 571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uitenbroek, H. 2000b, ApJ 536, 481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernazza, J. E., Avrett, E. H. & Loeser, R. 1981, ApJS 45, 635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedemeyer, S., Freytag, B., Steffen, M., Ludwig, H.-G. & Holweger, H. 2004, A&A 414, 1121 (W04)Google Scholar
Wedemeyer-Böhm, S., Kamp, I., Bruls, J. & Freytag, B. 2005, A&A 438, 1043Google Scholar
Wedemeyer-Böhm, S. & Steffen, M., submitted to A&AGoogle Scholar
Wedemeyer-Böhm, S., Ludwig, H.-G., Steffen, M., Freytag, B. & Leenaarts, J., in prepGoogle Scholar
White, S. M., Loukitcheva, M. & Solanki, S. K. 2006, A&A 456, 697Google Scholar
Wöger, F.Wedemeyer-Böhm Schmidt, W. & vonder Lühe, O., A&A, in pressGoogle Scholar